%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN326-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:41 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 5.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause7,negated_conjecture,
~ f(z(X1),z(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause7) ).
cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X1)
| f(X1,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
cnf(clause5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(X1)
| h(z(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause5) ).
cnf(clause2,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,X1)
| g(y(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause2) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ f(z(X1),z(X1)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause7]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X1)
| f(X1,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(X1)
| h(z(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ f(z(X1),z(X1)),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( f(X1,X1)
| g(y(X1)) ),
clause2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X1)
| f(X1,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(X1)
| h(z(X1)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
g(y(z(X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ g(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN326-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/5.46 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.21/5.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/5.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/5.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/5.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/5.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/5.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/5.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:50:37 UTC 2026
% 0.21/5.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/5.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/5.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/5.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/5.59 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/5.59 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/5.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % new_bool_3 with pid 2738909 completed with status 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.25/5.59 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/5.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/5.59 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/5.59 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/5.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2738913 completed with status 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/5.59 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/5.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/5.59 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/5.59 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/5.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/5.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/5.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/5.59
% 0.25/5.59 % Proof found!
% 0.25/5.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/5.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/5.59 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.25/5.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.25/5.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.25/5.59 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.25/5.59 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.25/5.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.25/5.59 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Generated clauses : 5
% 0.25/5.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.25/5.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Paramodulations : 3
% 0.25/5.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/5.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/5.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/5.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/5.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/5.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.25/5.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/5.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/5.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.25/5.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.25/5.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.25/5.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.25/5.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.25/5.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/5.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.25/5.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.25/5.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.25/5.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/5.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 187
% 0.25/5.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.25/5.59
% 0.25/5.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/5.59 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.25/5.59 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/5.59 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.25/5.59 % Maximum resident set size: 3372 pages
% 0.25/5.59
% 0.25/5.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/5.59 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.25/5.59 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.25/5.59 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.25/5.59 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.25/5.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------