%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN331-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:42 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 6 unt; 3 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(z(X1,X2),z(X1,X2))
| f(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
cnf(clause5,negated_conjecture,
( f(z(X2,X1),z(X2,X1))
| f(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause5) ).
cnf(clause7,negated_conjecture,
~ f(z(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause7) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(z(X1,X2),z(X1,X2))
| f(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause3]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(z(X1,X2),z(X1,X2))
| f(X1,X2) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( f(z(X2,X1),z(X2,X1))
| f(X1,X2) ),
clause5 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( f(X2,X1)
| f(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ f(z(X1,X2),X2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause7]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
f(X1,X1),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ f(z(X1,X2),X2),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
f(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN331-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.53 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.53 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.53 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.53 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.53 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.54 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.54 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:55:44 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.54 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.54 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % new_bool_3 with pid 2944909 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.60 % Search class: FGUNS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2944914 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.60 % Search class: FGUNS-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.60
% 0.15/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.15/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.15/0.60 % Processed clauses : 11
% 0.15/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.15/0.60 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.15/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.15/0.60 % Generated clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.15/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Paramodulations : 6
% 0.15/0.60 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.15/0.60 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.15/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.15/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.15/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 15
% 0.15/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.15/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 191
% 0.15/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 8
% 0.15/0.60
% 0.15/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.60 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.60 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.60 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.15/0.60
% 0.15/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.60 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.60 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.60 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------