↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SYN332+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:36:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   34 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   97 (  27   ~;  33   |;  15   &)
%                                         (  11 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   2 sgn   4   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_14_4,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] :
    ! [X3] :
      ( ( ( big_f(X1,X2)
          & big_f(X2,X1) )
      <~> big_f(X1,X3) )
     => ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
        <=> big_f(X3,X1) )
       => ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
          <=> big_f(X2,X3) )
         => ( ( ( big_f(X2,X1)
               => big_f(X1,X2) )
            <=> big_f(X3,X3) )
           => ( ( big_f(X1,X2)
              <=> big_f(X2,X1) )
            <=> big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_14_4) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( ~ ( ( big_f(X1,X2)
              & big_f(X2,X1) )
          <=> big_f(X1,X3) )
       => ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
          <=> big_f(X3,X1) )
         => ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
            <=> big_f(X2,X3) )
           => ( ( ( big_f(X2,X1)
                 => big_f(X1,X2) )
              <=> big_f(X3,X3) )
             => ( ( big_f(X1,X2)
                <=> big_f(X2,X1) )
              <=> big_f(X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_14_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X7,X8)
        | ~ big_f(X8,X7)
        | ~ big_f(X7,esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( big_f(X7,X8)
        | big_f(X7,esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( big_f(X8,X7)
        | big_f(X7,esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X7,esk1_2(X7,X8))
        | big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),X7) )
      & ( ~ big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),X7)
        | big_f(X7,esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X7,esk1_2(X7,X8))
        | big_f(X8,esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X8,esk1_2(X7,X8))
        | big_f(X7,esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( big_f(X8,X7)
        | big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X7,X8)
        | big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),esk1_2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),esk1_2(X7,X8))
        | ~ big_f(X8,X7)
        | big_f(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X7,X8)
        | ~ big_f(X8,X7)
        | ~ big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),X8) )
      & ( big_f(X7,X8)
        | big_f(X8,X7)
        | ~ big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),X8) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X7,X8)
        | big_f(X8,X7)
        | big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),X8) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X8,X7)
        | big_f(X7,X8)
        | big_f(esk1_2(X7,X8),X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | big_f(X2,X1)
    | ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ big_f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1,X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X2,esk1_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | big_f(X2,esk1_2(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))
    | big_f(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_f(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | big_f(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_f(X1,X2)
    | ~ big_f(X2,X1)
    | ~ big_f(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1,X2),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_12]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : SYN332+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 08:29:04 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.36  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.74  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.74  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.74  % Total time : 1.376s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------