↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SYN333-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tNNa5uh4gV true

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 05:04:30 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 0.70s
% Output   : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem  : SYN333-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tNNa5uh4gV true
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:41:38 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.31  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.10/0.31  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.31  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.10/0.32  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.10/0.32  % Running in FO mode
% 0.47/0.57  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.47/0.57  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.47/0.57  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.69/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.69/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.69/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.69/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.69/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.69/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.69/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.69/0.70  % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 0.69/0.70  % done 0 iterations in 0.007s
% 0.69/0.70  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.69/0.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/0.70  thf(z_type, type, z: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(g_type, type, g: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(f_type, type, f: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(clause3, conjecture,
% 0.69/0.70    (~( ( ~( g @ ( z @ X @ Y ) @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70        ( ~( g @ X @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70        ( ~( f @ ( z @ X @ Y ) @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70        ( ~( f @ Y @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) ))).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.69/0.70    (( ~( g @ ( z @ X @ Y ) @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70     ( ~( g @ X @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70     ( ~( f @ ( z @ X @ Y ) @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70     ( ~( f @ Y @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) )),
% 0.69/0.70    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause3])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.69/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.69/0.70         (~ (g @ (z @ X0 @ X1) @ (z @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.69/0.70          | ~ (g @ X0 @ (z @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.69/0.70          | ~ (f @ (z @ X0 @ X1) @ (z @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.69/0.70          | ~ (f @ X1 @ (z @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(clause2, conjecture,
% 0.69/0.70    (~( ( g @ X @ Y ) | ( ~( f @ ( z @ X @ Y ) @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70        ( ~( f @ Y @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) ))).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
% 0.69/0.70    (( g @ X @ Y ) | ( ~( f @ ( z @ X @ Y ) @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 0.69/0.70     ( ~( f @ Y @ ( z @ X @ Y ) ) )),
% 0.69/0.70    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause2])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.69/0.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.69/0.70         ( (g @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.69/0.70          | ~ (f @ (z @ X0 @ X1) @ (z @ X0 @ X1))
% 0.69/0.70          | ~ (f @ X1 @ (z @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(clause1, conjecture, (~( f @ X @ Y ))).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, (f @ X @ Y),
% 0.69/0.70    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause1])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (f @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (f @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (g @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.69/0.70                [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (g @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.69/0.70                [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (f @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:  (f @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.69/0.70  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ($false),
% 0.69/0.70      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.69/0.70                [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl3, 
% 0.69/0.70                 zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.69/0.70  
% 0.69/0.70  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/0.70  
% 0.69/0.70  
% 0.69/0.71  % Terminating...
% 0.91/0.79  % Runner terminated.
% 0.91/0.80  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------