↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN336+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:07:25 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.73s 3.90s
% Output   : Proof 3.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : SYN336+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:22:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.73/3.90  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/3.90  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.73/3.90    (Not
% 3.73/3.90      (∀ (X : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90        Exists fun Y1 => Exists fun Y2 => ∀ (Z : Iota), big_f X Z → big_f Y1 Z → big_f Y2 Z → big_f Y1 X → big_f Z Y2))
% 3.73/3.90    True
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 3.73/3.90    (∀ (X : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90      Exists fun Y1 => Exists fun Y2 => ∀ (Z : Iota), big_f X Z → big_f Y1 Z → big_f Y2 Z → big_f Y1 X → big_f Z Y2)
% 3.73/3.90    False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq
% 3.73/3.90      (Not
% 3.73/3.90        (Exists fun Y1 =>
% 3.73/3.90          Exists fun Y2 =>
% 3.73/3.90            ∀ (Z : Iota), big_f (skS.0 0 a) Z → big_f Y1 Z → big_f Y2 Z → big_f Y1 (skS.0 0 a) → big_f Z Y2))
% 3.73/3.90      True
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq
% 3.73/3.90      (Exists fun Y1 =>
% 3.73/3.90        Exists fun Y2 => ∀ (Z : Iota), big_f (skS.0 0 a) Z → big_f Y1 Z → big_f Y2 Z → big_f Y1 (skS.0 0 a) → big_f Z Y2)
% 3.73/3.90      False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq
% 3.73/3.90      (Exists fun Y2 => ∀ (Z : Iota), big_f (skS.0 0 a) Z → big_f a_1 Z → big_f Y2 Z → big_f a_1 (skS.0 0 a) → big_f Z Y2)
% 3.73/3.90      False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq (∀ (Z : Iota), big_f (skS.0 0 a) Z → big_f a_1 Z → big_f a_2 Z → big_f a_1 (skS.0 0 a) → big_f Z a_2) False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq
% 3.73/3.90      (Not
% 3.73/3.90        (big_f (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.73/3.90          big_f a_1 (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.73/3.90            big_f a_2 (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) → big_f a_1 (skS.0 0 a) → big_f (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) a_2))
% 3.73/3.90      True
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq
% 3.73/3.90      (big_f (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.73/3.90        big_f a_1 (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) →
% 3.73/3.90          big_f a_2 (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) → big_f a_1 (skS.0 0 a) → big_f (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) a_2)
% 3.73/3.90      False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq
% 3.73/3.90      (big_f a (skS.0 1 a_1 a a_2 a_3) →
% 3.73/3.90        big_f a_2 (skS.0 1 a_1 a a_2 a_3) → big_f a (skS.0 0 a_1) → big_f (skS.0 1 a_1 a a_2 a_3) a_2)
% 3.73/3.90      False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #11 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.73/3.90    Eq (big_f a (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 a a_3) → big_f a_2 (skS.0 0 a_1) → big_f (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2 a a_3) a) False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (big_f a (skS.0 0 a_1) → big_f (skS.0 1 a_1 a a_2 a_3) a_2) False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (big_f a (skS.0 0 a_1)) True
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #15 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota), Eq (big_f (skS.0 1 a a_1 a_2 a_3) a_2) False
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #16 (by superposition #[15, 14]): Eq False True
% 3.73/3.90  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): False
% 3.73/3.90  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------