↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN336+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   3   ~;   0   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   2 sgn   6   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_15_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2,X3] :
    ! [X4] :
      ( big_f(X1,X4)
     => ( big_f(X2,X4)
       => ( big_f(X3,X4)
         => ( big_f(X2,X1)
           => big_f(X4,X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_15_1) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
      ? [X2,X3] :
      ! [X4] :
        ( big_f(X1,X4)
       => ( big_f(X2,X4)
         => ( big_f(X3,X4)
           => ( big_f(X2,X1)
             => big_f(X4,X3) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[church_46_15_1]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ~ big_f(esk2_2(X6,X7),X7)
      & big_f(X6,esk1_0)
      & big_f(X7,esk2_2(X6,X7))
      & big_f(X6,esk2_2(X6,X7))
      & big_f(esk1_0,esk2_2(X6,X7)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(X1,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN336+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:49:55 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % new_bool_3 with pid 1714484 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.41  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41  % Search class: FUUNM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1714489 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.41  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41  % Search class: FUUNM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41  % Parsed axioms                        : 1
% 0.15/0.41  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.15/0.41  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.15/0.41  % Processed clauses                    : 5
% 0.15/0.41  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % ...remaining for further processing  : 5
% 0.15/0.41  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Generated clauses                    : 1
% 0.15/0.41  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Paramodulations                      : 1
% 0.15/0.41  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  % Current number of processed clauses  : 5
% 0.15/0.41  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.15/0.41  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.41  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.15/0.41  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.41  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 222
% 0.15/0.41  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 72
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  % System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.41  % Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.41  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.41  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------