%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Moca---0.1 % Problem : SYN336-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : moca.sh %s % Computer : n005.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:15:26 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.38s % Output : Proof 0.20s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN336-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.2.0. % 0.06/0.13 % Command : moca.sh %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:44:22 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable % 0.20/0.38 % SZS output start Proof % 0.20/0.38 The input problem is unsatisfiable because % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable: % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 f(a, z(Y1, Y2)) % 0.20/0.38 f(Y1, z(Y1, Y2)) % 0.20/0.38 f(Y2, z(Y1, Y2)) % 0.20/0.38 f(Y1, a) % 0.20/0.38 f(z(Y1, Y2), Y2) ==> \bottom % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 This holds because % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)): % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 E: % 0.20/0.38 f(Y1, a) = true__ % 0.20/0.38 f(Y1, z(Y1, Y2)) = true__ % 0.20/0.38 f(Y2, z(Y1, Y2)) = true__ % 0.20/0.38 f(a, z(Y1, Y2)) = true__ % 0.20/0.38 f1(f(z(Y1, Y2), Y2)) = true__ % 0.20/0.38 f1(true__) = false__ % 0.20/0.38 G: % 0.20/0.38 true__ = false__ % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 This holds because % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS: % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 f(Y1, a) -> true__ % 0.20/0.38 f(Y1, z(Y1, Y2)) -> true__ % 0.20/0.38 f(Y2, z(Y1, Y2)) -> true__ % 0.20/0.38 f(a, z(Y1, Y2)) -> true__ % 0.20/0.38 f1(f(z(Y1, Y2), Y2)) -> true__ % 0.20/0.38 f1(true__) -> false__ % 0.20/0.38 false__ -> true__ % 0.20/0.38 with the LPO induced by % 0.20/0.38 f1 > z > a > f > false__ > true__ % 0.20/0.38 % 0.20/0.38 % SZS output end Proof % 0.20/0.38 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------