↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SYN341+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:10:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   9   ~;   0   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   1 sgn  21   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(church_46_15_6,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
    ? [X3] :
    ! [X4] :
      ( big_f(X1,X2,X3)
     => big_f(X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',church_46_15_6) ).

fof(f_1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
      ? [X3] :
      ! [X4] :
        ( big_f(X1,X2,X3)
       => big_f(X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[church_46_15_6]) ).

fof(f_1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] :
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,X3,X4)
      & big_f(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [U_3] :
    ? [U_2] :
    ! [U_1] :
    ? [U_0] :
      ( ~ big_f(U_2,U_1,U_0)
      & big_f(U_3,U_2,U_1) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_1_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [U_3] :
    ? [U_2] :
      ( ! [U_5] :
        ? [U_0] : ~ big_f(U_2,U_5,U_0)
      & ! [U_4] : big_f(U_3,U_2,U_4) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_1_3]) ).

fof(f_1_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [U_3] :
      ( ! [U_5] :
        ? [U_0] : ~ big_f(sK1(U_3),U_5,U_0)
      & ! [U_4] : big_f(U_3,sK1(U_3),U_4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_2,sK1(U_3))],[f_1_4]) ).

fof(f_1_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [U_3] :
      ( ! [U_5] : ~ big_f(sK1(U_3),U_5,sK2(U_3,U_5))
      & ! [U_4] : big_f(U_3,sK1(U_3),U_4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_0,sK2(U_3,U_5))],[f_1_5]) ).

fof(f_1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_3,U_5] : ~ big_f(sK1(U_3),U_5,sK2(U_3,U_5))
    & ! [U_3,U_4] : big_f(U_3,sK1(U_3),U_4) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_1_6]) ).

cnf(f_1_8,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(U_3,sK1(U_3),U_4),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(sK1(U_3),U_5,sK2(U_3,U_5)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ big_f(sK1(U_26),sK1(sK1(U_26)),sK2(U_26,sK1(sK1(U_26)))),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_1_9]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    big_f(sK1(U_26),sK1(sK1(U_26)),sK2(U_26,sK1(sK1(U_26)))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN341+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 06:28:35 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------