%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN346-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:15 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.05/0.13 % Problem : SYN346-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0. % 0.05/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 20:18:24 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.49/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.54/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % File : SYN346-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0. % 0.54/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.54/0.61 % Problem : Church problem 46.17 (2) % 0.54/0.61 % Version : Especial. % 0.54/0.61 % English : % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Refs : [Chu56] Church (1956), Introduction to Mathematical Logic I % 0.54/0.61 % : [FL+93] Fermuller et al. (1993), Resolution Methods for the De % 0.54/0.61 % : [Tam94] Tammet (1994), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe. % 0.54/0.61 % Source : [Tam94] % 0.54/0.61 % Names : Ch17N2 [Tam94] % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.0.0 % 0.54/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 4 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 4 neg) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of variables : 8 ( 3 sgn) % 0.54/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Comments : All the problems here can be decided by using a certain % 0.54/0.61 % completeness-preserving term ordering strategies. See [FL+93]. % 0.54/0.61 % : The conversion from the full 1st order form in [Chu56] % 0.54/0.61 % to clause form was done by hand by Tanel Tammet. % 0.54/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause1,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.62 f(b,z1(Y1,Y2)) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause2,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.62 f(Y1,z2(Y1,Y2)) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.62 ( ~ f(Y1,z1(Y1,Y2)) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ f(Y2,z1(Y1,Y2)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 cnf(clause4,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.62 ( ~ f(b,z2(Y1,Y2)) % 0.54/0.62 | ~ f(Y2,z2(Y1,Y2)) ) ). % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 % Proof found % 0.54/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.62 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.62 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.62 %VarNum:16(SingletonVarNum:8) % 0.54/0.62 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.54/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.54/0.62 %SharedTerms:1 % 0.54/0.62 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 % 0.54/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.54/0.62 [1]P1(a1,f2(x11,x12)) % 0.54/0.62 [2]P1(x21,f3(x21,x22)) % 0.54/0.62 [3]~P1(x31,f3(x32,x31))+~P1(a1,f3(x32,x31)) % 0.54/0.62 [4]~P1(x41,f2(x42,x41))+~P1(x42,f2(x42,x41)) % 0.54/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.62 % 0.54/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.62 cnf(5,plain, % 0.54/0.62 ($false), % 0.54/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3]), % 0.54/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------