↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN347+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.63s 16.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   2 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  117 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  137 (  53   ~;  59   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn  49   !;  13   ?;  23   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
    ? [X2,X3] :
    ! [X4] :
      ( ( big_f(X0,X4)
      <=> big_f(X1,X4) )
      | ( ( big_f(X2,X4)
        <=> big_f(X3,X4) )
      <=> big_f(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_17_3) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
      ? [X2,X3] :
      ! [X4] :
        ( ( big_f(X0,X4)
        <=> big_f(X1,X4) )
        | ( ( big_f(X2,X4)
          <=> big_f(X3,X4) )
        <=> big_f(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( big_f(X0,X4)
      <~> big_f(X1,X4) )
      & ( ( big_f(X2,X4)
        <=> big_f(X3,X4) )
      <~> big_f(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( big_f(X0,X4)
        | big_f(X1,X4) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X0,X4)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X4) )
      & ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X4)
            | big_f(X3,X4) )
          & ( ~ big_f(X3,X4)
            | big_f(X2,X4) ) )
        | big_f(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( ( big_f(X2,X4)
            | big_f(X3,X4) )
          & ( ~ big_f(X2,X4)
            | ~ big_f(X3,X4) ) )
        | ~ big_f(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
    ? [X4] :
      ( ( big_f(X0,X4)
        | big_f(X1,X4) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X0,X4)
        | ~ big_f(X1,X4) )
      & ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,X4)
            | big_f(X3,X4) )
          & ( ~ big_f(X3,X4)
            | big_f(X2,X4) ) )
        | big_f(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( ( big_f(X2,X4)
            | big_f(X3,X4) )
          & ( ~ big_f(X2,X4)
            | ~ big_f(X3,X4) ) )
        | ~ big_f(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ( big_f(sK0,sK2(X2,X3))
        | big_f(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(X2,X3))
        | ~ big_f(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) )
      & ( ( ( ~ big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
            | big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3)) )
          & ( ~ big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
            | big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3)) ) )
        | big_f(sK0,sK1) )
      & ( ( ( big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
            | big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3)) )
          & ( ~ big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
            | ~ big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3)) ) )
        | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X4,sK2(X2,X3))],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( big_f(sK0,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_f(sK1,sK2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
      | big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ big_f(X2,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_f(X3,sK2(X2,X3))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
      | ~ big_f(X1,sK2(X1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK2(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(X1,sK2(X1,X0))
      | big_f(X0,sK2(X1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK0,sK1)
      | big_f(X1,sK2(X1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK2(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK0,sK1)
      | big_f(X1,sK2(X0,X1))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK1,sK2(X0,X1))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK1,sK2(X0,X1))
      | big_f(sK0,sK2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ( big_f(sK0,sK2(sK0,sK0))
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(sK0,sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_f(sK0,sK1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_57,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(X1,sK2(X1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK2(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_57,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_116,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(X1,sK2(X0,X1))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_146,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK1,sK2(X0,X1))
      | big_f(sK0,sK2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

tcf(c_147,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK1,sK2(X0,X1))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

tcf(c_148,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK1,sK2(sK1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK2(sK1,X0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).

tcf(c_149,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK1,sK2(sK1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(sK1,X0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_147]) ).

tcf(c_150,plain,
    ( big_f(sK1,sK2(sK1,sK0))
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(sK1,sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_148]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1,sK2(sK1,sK0))
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK2(sK1,sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_149]) ).

tcf(c_157,plain,
    ( big_f(sK0,sK2(sK1,sK0))
    | ~ big_f(sK1,sK2(sK1,sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_116]) ).

tcf(c_158,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK1,sK2(sK1,X0))
      | big_f(sK0,sK2(sK1,X0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_146]) ).

tcf(c_159,plain,
    ( big_f(sK1,sK2(sK1,sK0))
    | big_f(sK0,sK2(sK1,sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_158]) ).

tcf(c_160,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_159,c_157,c_151,c_150]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN347+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/15.60  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/15.60  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/15.60  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/15.60  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/15.60  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/15.60  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/15.60  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/15.60  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:55:54 UTC 2026
% 0.10/15.60  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/15.60  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/15.64  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/15.64  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/15.65  
% 0.10/15.65  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/15.65  
% 0.10/15.65  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/15.66  % Proving...
% 1.63/16.51  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.63/16.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.63/16.51  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.63/16.51  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Proving...
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % 
% 1.63/16.51  % clauses                               4
% 1.63/16.51  % conjectures                           2
% 1.63/16.51  % EPR                                   0
% 1.63/16.51  % Horn                                  3
% 1.63/16.51  % unary                                 0
% 1.63/16.51  % binary                                4
% 1.63/16.51  % lits                                  8
% 1.63/16.51  % lits eq                               0
% 1.63/16.51  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.63/16.51  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.63/16.51  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.63/16.51  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.63/16.51  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ 
% 1.63/16.51  % Current options:
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % ------ Proving...
% 1.63/16.51  % 
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.63/16.51  
% 1.63/16.51  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------