%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN348-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_16ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_32ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
clause5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_16,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_17,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2) ),
c_0_18,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_19,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(g(X1,X2),X2) ),
c_0_20,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(g(X1,X2),X2) ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_23,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_24,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_25,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_26,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_27,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| ~ f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_28,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| ~ f(g(X1,X2),X2)
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| f(X1,g(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_29,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(g(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ f(X1,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),w(X1))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,X2))
| f(X2,g(X1,X2))
| f(g(X1,X2),X2) ),
c_0_30,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
( f(g(X1,w(X1)),X1)
| f(X1,g(X1,w(X1)))
| f(w(X1),g(X1,w(X1)))
| f(g(X1,w(X1)),w(X1)) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN348-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:51:49 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 2742532 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2742538 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 16
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses : 16
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.14/0.43 % Processed clauses : 18
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.14/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Generated clauses : 22
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Paramodulations : 20
% 0.14/0.43 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 109
% 0.14/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2452
% 0.14/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 53
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3604 pages
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------