%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN349-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:47:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 5 unt; 7 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 41 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause1,negated_conjecture,
( f(X2,g(X2,X3))
| ~ f(w(X2),g(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause1) ).
cnf(clause5,negated_conjecture,
( f(X11,g(X11,X12))
| f(g(X11,X12),X12)
| f(X12,g(X11,X12))
| f(g(X11,X12),w(X11)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause5) ).
cnf(c7,plain,
( f(X13,g(X13,w(X13)))
| f(g(X13,w(X13)),w(X13)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[clause5,clause1]) ).
cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X6,g(X6,X7))
| f(g(X6,X7),X7)
| ~ f(X7,g(X6,X7))
| f(g(X6,X7),w(X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause3) ).
cnf(clause2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X4,g(X4,X5))
| f(w(X4),g(X4,X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause2) ).
cnf(c12,plain,
( f(g(X14,w(X14)),w(X14))
| f(w(X14),g(X14,w(X14))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c7,clause2]) ).
cnf(c14,plain,
( f(g(X16,w(X16)),w(X16))
| ~ f(X16,g(X16,w(X16))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c12,clause3]) ).
cnf(c17,plain,
f(g(X17,w(X17)),w(X17)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c14,c7]) ).
cnf(clause8,negated_conjecture,
( f(X32,g(X32,X33))
| ~ f(g(X32,X33),X33)
| f(X33,g(X32,X33))
| ~ f(g(X32,X33),w(X32)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).
cnf(c31,plain,
( f(X70,g(X70,w(X70)))
| ~ f(g(X70,w(X70)),w(X70))
| f(w(X70),g(X70,w(X70))) ),
inference(factor,[status(thm)],[clause8]) ).
cnf(c66,plain,
( f(X71,g(X71,w(X71)))
| f(w(X71),g(X71,w(X71))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c31,c17]) ).
cnf(c70,plain,
f(X72,g(X72,w(X72))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c66,clause1]) ).
cnf(c69,plain,
f(w(X73),g(X73,w(X73))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c66,clause2]) ).
cnf(clause10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X42,g(X42,X43))
| ~ f(g(X42,X43),X43)
| ~ f(X43,g(X42,X43))
| ~ f(g(X42,X43),w(X42)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause10) ).
cnf(c40,plain,
( ~ f(X82,g(X82,w(X82)))
| ~ f(g(X82,w(X82)),w(X82))
| ~ f(w(X82),g(X82,w(X82))) ),
inference(factor,[status(thm)],[clause10]) ).
cnf(c77,plain,
( ~ f(X83,g(X83,w(X83)))
| ~ f(g(X83,w(X83)),w(X83)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c40,c69]) ).
cnf(c83,plain,
~ f(X84,g(X84,w(X84))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c77,c17]) ).
cnf(c86,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c83,c70]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN349-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed May 8 19:47:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.58 % Version: 1.5
% 0.40/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.58
% 0.40/0.58 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.40/0.58 % Processed clauses : 25
% 0.40/0.58 % Factors computed : 7
% 0.40/0.58 % Resolvents computed: 81
% 0.40/0.58 % Tautologies deleted: 19
% 0.40/0.58 % Forward subsumed : 20
% 0.40/0.58 % Backward subsumed : 9
% 0.40/0.58 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.40/0.58 % User time : 0.222 s
% 0.40/0.58 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.40/0.58 % Total time : 0.231 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------