↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN350+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:39:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.73s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   98 (  36   ~;  33   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  32   !;  10   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1,X2] :
    ! [X3] :
      ( ( big_f(X0,X3)
      <=> big_f(X3,X0) )
     => ( big_f(X0,X3)
      <=> ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
           => big_f(X1,X2) )
          & big_f(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',church_46_18_2) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
      ? [X1,X2] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( ( big_f(X0,X3)
        <=> big_f(X3,X0) )
       => ( big_f(X0,X3)
        <=> ( ( big_f(X1,X3)
             => big_f(X1,X2) )
            & big_f(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2] :
    ? [X3] :
      ( ( big_f(X0,X3)
      <=> big_f(X3,X0) )
      & ( big_f(X0,X3)
      <~> ( ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
            | big_f(X1,X2) )
          & big_f(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2] :
    ? [X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X0,X3)
        | big_f(X3,X0) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X3,X0)
        | big_f(X0,X3) )
      & ( big_f(X0,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
            | big_f(X1,X2) )
          & big_f(X2,X3) ) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X0,X3)
        | ( big_f(X1,X3)
          & ~ big_f(X1,X2) )
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2] :
    ? [X3] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(X0,X3)
        | big_f(X3,X0) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X3,X0)
        | big_f(X0,X3) )
      & ( big_f(X0,X3)
        | ( ( ~ big_f(X1,X3)
            | big_f(X1,X2) )
          & big_f(X2,X3) ) )
      & ( ~ big_f(X0,X3)
        | ( big_f(X1,X3)
          & ~ big_f(X1,X2) )
        | ~ big_f(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2))
        | big_f(sK1(X1,X2),sK0) )
      & ( ~ big_f(sK1(X1,X2),sK0)
        | big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2)) )
      & ( big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2))
        | ( ( ~ big_f(X1,sK1(X1,X2))
            | big_f(X1,X2) )
          & big_f(X2,sK1(X1,X2)) ) )
      & ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2))
        | ( big_f(X1,sK1(X1,X2))
          & ~ big_f(X1,X2) )
        | ~ big_f(X2,sK1(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X3,sK1(X1,X2))],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2))
      | big_f(sK1(X1,X2),sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2))
      | big_f(X2,sK1(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X2))
      | ~ big_f(X1,X2)
      | ~ big_f(X2,sK1(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(X1,X0)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK1(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X0))
      | big_f(X0,sK1(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK1(X0,X1),sK0)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK1(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ( big_f(sK1(sK0,sK0),sK0)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(sK0,sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

tcf(c_114,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X0))
      | big_f(X0,sK1(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_116,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(X1,X0)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(X1,X0))
      | ~ big_f(X0,sK1(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_120,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ big_f(sK1(X0,X1),sK0)
      | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(sK1(X0,X1),sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_116]) ).

tcf(c_121,plain,
    ( ~ big_f(sK1(sK0,sK0),sK0)
    | ~ big_f(sK0,sK1(sK1(sK0,sK0),sK0)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_120]) ).

tcf(c_123,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : big_f(sK0,sK1(sK1(X0,X1),sK0)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_114]) ).

tcf(c_124,plain,
    big_f(sK0,sK1(sK1(sK0,sK0),sK0)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_123]) ).

tcf(c_125,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_121,c_56,c_55]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN350+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/5.38  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 00:56:07 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.44  
% 0.14/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.44  
% 0.14/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.45  % Proving...
% 1.73/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.73/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.73/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % 
% 1.73/6.30  % clauses                               6
% 1.73/6.30  % conjectures                           6
% 1.73/6.30  % EPR                                   0
% 1.73/6.30  % Horn                                  4
% 1.73/6.30  % unary                                 0
% 1.73/6.30  % binary                                3
% 1.73/6.30  % lits                                  15
% 1.73/6.30  % lits eq                               0
% 1.73/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.73/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.73/6.30  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.73/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.73/6.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ 
% 1.73/6.30  % Current options:
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 1.73/6.30  % 
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.73/6.30  
% 1.73/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------