↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN352-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SYN352-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 20:31:24 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.62  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.57/0.62  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.62  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.57/0.62  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.57/0.62  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.57/0.62  
% 0.57/0.62  % Result      :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.57/0.62  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.57/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63  % File     : SYN352-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.57/0.63  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.57/0.63  % Problem  : Church problem 46.18 (4)
% 0.57/0.63  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.57/0.63  % English  :
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  % Refs     : [Chu56] Church (1956), Introduction to Mathematical Logic I
% 0.57/0.63  %          : [FL+93] Fermuller et al. (1993), Resolution Methods for the De
% 0.57/0.63  %          : [Tam94] Tammet (1994), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe.
% 0.57/0.63  % Source   : [Tam94]
% 0.57/0.63  % Names    : Ch18N4 [Tam94]
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.57/0.63  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.57/0.63  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   1 unt;   4 nHn;   5 RR)
% 0.57/0.63  %            Number of literals    :   18 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
% 0.57/0.63  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 0.57/0.63  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.57/0.63  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.57/0.63  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.57/0.63  %            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn)
% 0.57/0.63  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  % Comments : All the problems here can be decided by using a certain
% 0.57/0.63  %            completeness-preserving term ordering strategies. See [FL+93].
% 0.57/0.63  %          : The conversion from the full 1st order form in [Chu56]
% 0.57/0.63  %            to clause form was done by hand by Tanel Tammet.
% 0.57/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(clause1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63      f(a,b) ).
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(clause2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63      ( ~ f(X,Y)
% 0.57/0.63      | f(b,z(X,Y))
% 0.57/0.63      | f(Y,z(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(clause3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63      ( f(X,Y)
% 0.57/0.63      | f(z(X,Y),z(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(clause4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63      ( f(b,z(X,Y))
% 0.57/0.63      | f(X,z(X,Y))
% 0.57/0.63      | f(z(X,Y),z(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(clause5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63      ( ~ f(b,z(X,Y))
% 0.57/0.63      | ~ f(X,z(X,Y))
% 0.57/0.63      | f(z(X,Y),z(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(clause6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63      ( ~ f(X,Y)
% 0.57/0.63      | ~ f(X,z(X,Y))
% 0.57/0.63      | ~ f(Y,z(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(clause7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.57/0.63      ( ~ f(X,Y)
% 0.57/0.63      | f(X,z(X,Y))
% 0.57/0.63      | f(Y,z(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.57/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.57/0.63  %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.57/0.63  %VarNum:47(SingletonVarNum:12)
% 0.57/0.63  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.57/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.57/0.63  %SharedTerms:3
% 0.57/0.63  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% 0.57/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.57/0.63  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.57/0.63  [2]P1(x21,x22)+P1(f3(x21,x22),f3(x21,x22))
% 0.57/0.63  [3]~P1(x32,x31)+P1(x31,f3(x32,x31))+P1(a2,f3(x32,x31))
% 0.57/0.63  [4]~P1(x42,x41)+P1(x41,f3(x42,x41))+P1(x42,f3(x42,x41))
% 0.57/0.63  [5]P1(f3(x51,x52),f3(x51,x52))+P1(x51,f3(x51,x52))+P1(a2,f3(x51,x52))
% 0.57/0.63  [6]~P1(x61,x62)+~P1(x62,f3(x61,x62))+~P1(x61,f3(x61,x62))
% 0.57/0.63  [7]P1(f3(x71,x72),f3(x71,x72))+~P1(x71,f3(x71,x72))+~P1(a2,f3(x71,x72))
% 0.57/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.57/0.63  
% 0.57/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(12,plain,
% 0.57/0.63     (P1(f3(x121,x122),f3(f3(x121,x122),f3(x121,x122)))+~P1(x121,f3(x121,x122))+~P1(a2,f3(x121,x122))),
% 0.57/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,4])).
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.57/0.63     (~P1(x191,f3(x191,x192))+~P1(f3(x191,x192),f3(x191,x192))+~P1(a2,f3(x191,x192))),
% 0.57/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,6])).
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.57/0.63     (~P1(x201,f3(x201,x202))+~P1(a2,f3(x201,x202))),
% 0.57/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,7])).
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.57/0.63     (P1(x231,x232)+P1(f3(x231,x232),f3(f3(x231,x232),f3(x231,x232)))),
% 0.57/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4])).
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.57/0.63     (P1(x271,x272)+~P1(f3(x271,x272),f3(f3(x271,x272),f3(x271,x272)))),
% 0.57/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6])).
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.57/0.63     (P1(x281,x282)),
% 0.57/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,23])).
% 0.57/0.63  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.57/0.63     ($false),
% 0.57/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,20]),
% 0.57/0.63     ['proof']).
% 0.57/0.63  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.63  % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------