%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN365+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:20 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 58.54s 59.65s % Output : CNFRefutation 58.81s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN365+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 19:50:54 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.54/59.63 %------------------------------------------- % 58.54/59.63 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.54/59.63 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.54/59.63 % Transform :cnf % 58.54/59.63 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.54/59.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.54/59.63 % 58.54/59.63 % Result :Theorem 58.010000s % 58.54/59.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.010000s % 58.54/59.63 %------------------------------------------- % 58.54/59.65 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.54/59.65 % File : SYN365+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 58.54/59.65 % Domain : Syntactic % 58.54/59.65 % Problem : Peter Andrews Problem X2116 % 58.54/59.65 % Version : Especial. % 58.54/59.65 % English : % 58.54/59.65 % 58.54/59.65 % Refs : [And86] Andrews (1986), An Introduction to Mathematical Logic % 58.54/59.65 % : [And94] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.54/59.65 % Source : [And94] % 58.54/59.65 % Names : X2116 [And86] % 58.54/59.65 % 58.54/59.65 % Status : Theorem % 58.54/59.65 % Rating : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 58.54/59.65 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 58.54/59.65 % Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ) % 58.54/59.65 % Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 9 avg) % 58.54/59.65 % Number of connectives : 8 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 4 &) % 58.54/59.65 % ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 58.54/59.65 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 7 avg) % 58.54/59.65 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 58.54/59.65 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 58.54/59.65 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty) % 58.54/59.65 % Number of variables : 5 ( 3 !; 2 ?) % 58.54/59.65 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 58.54/59.65 % 58.54/59.65 % Comments : % 58.54/59.65 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.54/59.65 fof(x2116,conjecture, % 58.54/59.65 ( ( ! [X] : % 58.54/59.65 ? [Y] : % 58.54/59.65 ( big_p(X) % 58.54/59.65 => ( big_r(X,g(h(Y))) % 58.54/59.65 & big_p(Y) ) ) % 58.54/59.65 & ! [W] : % 58.54/59.65 ( big_p(W) % 58.54/59.65 => ( big_p(g(W)) % 58.54/59.65 & big_p(h(W)) ) ) ) % 58.54/59.65 => ! [X] : % 58.54/59.65 ( big_p(X) % 58.54/59.65 => ? [Y] : % 58.54/59.65 ( big_r(X,Y) % 58.54/59.65 & big_p(Y) ) ) ) ). % 58.54/59.65 % 58.54/59.65 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.54/59.65 %------------------------------------------- % 58.54/59.65 % Proof found % 58.54/59.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.54/59.65 % SZS output start Proof % 58.60/59.66 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.60/59.66 %VarNum:11(SingletonVarNum:5) % 58.60/59.66 %MaxLitNum:2 % 58.60/59.66 %MaxfuncDepth:3 % 58.60/59.66 %SharedTerms:2 % 58.60/59.66 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 % 58.60/59.66 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 58.60/59.66 [1]P1(a1) % 58.60/59.66 [5]~P1(x51)+~P2(a1,x51) % 58.60/59.66 [2]~P1(x21)+P1(f3(x21)) % 58.60/59.66 [3]~P1(x31)+P1(f4(x31)) % 58.60/59.66 [4]~P1(x41)+P1(f2(x41)) % 58.60/59.66 [6]~P1(x61)+P2(x61,f4(f3(f2(x61)))) % 58.60/59.66 %EqnAxiom % 58.60/59.66 % 58.60/59.66 %------------------------------------------- % 58.71/59.75 cnf(7,plain, % 58.71/59.75 (P1(f3(f4(a1)))), % 58.71/59.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3])). % 58.71/59.75 cnf(17,plain, % 58.71/59.75 (P1(f3(f2(a1)))), % 58.71/59.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4])). % 58.71/59.75 cnf(139276,plain, % 58.71/59.75 (~P1(f4(f3(f2(a1))))), % 58.71/59.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,1,2,3,4,6,5])). % 58.71/59.75 cnf(139295,plain, % 58.71/59.75 ($false), % 58.71/59.75 inference(scs_inference,[],[139276,17,2,3]), % 58.71/59.75 ['proof']). % 58.81/59.86 % SZS output end Proof % 58.81/59.86 % Total time :58.010000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------