%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SYN365+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:27:23 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 4.34s 1.35s % Output : Proof 5.08s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN365+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:37:57 EDT 2023 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.18/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.18/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.18/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.18/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.18/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.18/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.18/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.18/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.18/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.18/0.62 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.18/0.62 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 1.56/0.98 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 1.56/0.98 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.25/1.02 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.25/1.02 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.25/1.02 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.25/1.03 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.25/1.03 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.88/1.14 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.88/1.14 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.88/1.14 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.88/1.15 Prover 6: Proving ... % 2.88/1.15 Prover 5: Proving ... % 2.88/1.15 Prover 2: Proving ... % 2.88/1.17 Prover 0: Proving ... % 4.34/1.35 Prover 0: proved (733ms) % 4.34/1.35 % 4.34/1.35 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.34/1.35 % 4.34/1.36 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 4.34/1.36 Prover 3: stopped % 4.34/1.36 Prover 2: stopped % 4.34/1.36 Prover 5: stopped % 4.34/1.37 Prover 6: stopped % 4.34/1.39 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 4.34/1.39 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 4.34/1.39 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 4.34/1.39 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 4.34/1.39 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 4.34/1.39 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 4.34/1.39 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 4.34/1.39 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 4.34/1.39 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.34/1.39 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.34/1.39 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.34/1.40 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.34/1.40 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 5.08/1.41 Prover 10: gave up % 5.08/1.42 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.08/1.42 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.08/1.42 Prover 4: Found proof (size 31) % 5.08/1.42 Prover 4: proved (802ms) % 5.08/1.42 Prover 7: gave up % 5.08/1.42 Prover 1: stopped % 5.08/1.42 Prover 8: stopped % 5.08/1.42 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.08/1.42 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683 % 5.08/1.43 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.08/1.43 Prover 13: stopped % 5.08/1.43 Prover 16: Preprocessing ... % 5.08/1.44 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.08/1.44 Prover 11: stopped % 5.08/1.45 Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.08/1.45 Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.08/1.45 Prover 16: stopped % 5.08/1.45 % 5.08/1.45 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.08/1.45 % 5.08/1.46 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 5.08/1.47 Assumptions after simplification: % 5.08/1.47 --------------------------------- % 5.08/1.47 % 5.08/1.47 (x2116) % 5.08/1.52 ? [v0: $i] : (big_p(v0) = 0 & $i(v0) & ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (h(v1) % 5.08/1.52 = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: % 5.08/1.52 any] : (g(v1) = v4 & big_p(v4) = v5 & big_p(v2) = v6 & big_p(v1) = v3 & % 5.08/1.52 $i(v4) & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) & ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] % 5.08/1.52 : ( ~ (g(v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: $i] : % 5.08/1.52 ? [v6: any] : (h(v1) = v5 & big_p(v5) = v6 & big_p(v2) = v4 & big_p(v1) = % 5.08/1.52 v3 & $i(v5) & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) & ! [v1: $i] : ! % 5.08/1.52 [v2: any] : ( ~ (big_p(v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : % 5.08/1.52 ? [v5: $i] : ? [v6: any] : ? [v7: any] : (h(v3) = v4 & g(v4) = v5 & % 5.08/1.52 big_r(v1, v5) = v6 & big_p(v3) = v7 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 % 5.08/1.52 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v6 = 0)))) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (big_r(v0, v1) = 0) % 5.08/1.52 | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & big_p(v1) = v2)) & ! [v1: $i] % 5.08/1.52 : ( ~ (big_p(v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : (h(v1) = v3 % 5.08/1.52 & g(v1) = v2 & big_p(v3) = 0 & big_p(v2) = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2))) & ! % 5.08/1.52 [v1: $i] : ( ~ (big_p(v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & % 5.08/1.52 big_r(v0, v1) = v2))) % 5.08/1.52 % 5.08/1.52 (function-axioms) % 5.08/1.52 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! % 5.08/1.52 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (big_r(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (big_r(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! % 5.08/1.52 [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (h(v2) = v1) | ~ (h(v2) % 5.08/1.52 = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (g(v2) = % 5.08/1.52 v1) | ~ (g(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: % 5.08/1.52 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (big_p(v2) = v1) | ~ % 5.08/1.52 (big_p(v2) = v0)) % 5.08/1.52 % 5.08/1.52 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 5.08/1.52 --------------------------------- % 5.08/1.52 % 5.08/1.52 Begin of proof % 5.08/1.53 | % 5.08/1.53 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies: % 5.08/1.53 | (1) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : % 5.08/1.53 | (v1 = v0 | ~ (big_p(v2) = v1) | ~ (big_p(v2) = v0)) % 5.08/1.53 | % 5.08/1.53 | DELTA: instantiating (x2116) with fresh symbol all_3_0 gives: % 5.08/1.54 | (2) big_p(all_3_0) = 0 & $i(all_3_0) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ % 5.08/1.54 | (h(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: any] % 5.08/1.54 | : ? [v5: any] : (g(v0) = v3 & big_p(v3) = v4 & big_p(v1) = v5 & % 5.08/1.54 | big_p(v0) = v2 & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) & ! % 5.08/1.54 | [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (g(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any] : % 5.08/1.54 | ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : (h(v0) = v4 & big_p(v4) = % 5.08/1.54 | v5 & big_p(v1) = v3 & big_p(v0) = v2 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 % 5.08/1.54 | = 0 & v3 = 0)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (big_p(v0) % 5.08/1.54 | = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? % 5.08/1.54 | [v5: any] : ? [v6: any] : (h(v2) = v3 & g(v3) = v4 & big_r(v0, v4) = % 5.08/1.54 | v5 & big_p(v2) = v6 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 % 5.08/1.54 | = 0 & v5 = 0)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_r(all_3_0, v0) = 0) | % 5.08/1.54 | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & big_p(v0) = v1)) & ! [v0: % 5.08/1.54 | $i] : ( ~ (big_p(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : % 5.08/1.54 | (h(v0) = v2 & g(v0) = v1 & big_p(v2) = 0 & big_p(v1) = 0 & $i(v2) & % 5.08/1.54 | $i(v1))) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_p(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: % 5.08/1.54 | int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & big_r(all_3_0, v0) = v1)) % 5.08/1.54 | % 5.08/1.54 | ALPHA: (2) implies: % 5.08/1.54 | (3) $i(all_3_0) % 5.08/1.54 | (4) big_p(all_3_0) = 0 % 5.08/1.54 | (5) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (big_r(all_3_0, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: int] : % 5.08/1.54 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) & big_p(v0) = v1)) % 5.08/1.54 | (6) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (big_p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: % 5.08/1.54 | $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: any] : % 5.08/1.54 | (h(v2) = v3 & g(v3) = v4 & big_r(v0, v4) = v5 & big_p(v2) = v6 & % 5.08/1.54 | $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) % 5.08/1.54 | (7) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (g(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any] % 5.08/1.54 | : ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : (h(v0) = v4 & big_p(v4) % 5.08/1.54 | = v5 & big_p(v1) = v3 & big_p(v0) = v2 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | % 5.08/1.54 | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) % 5.08/1.55 | (8) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (h(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any] % 5.08/1.55 | : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: any] : (g(v0) = v3 & big_p(v3) % 5.08/1.55 | = v4 & big_p(v1) = v5 & big_p(v0) = v2 & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | % 5.08/1.55 | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_3_0, 0, simplifying with (3), (4) % 5.08/1.55 | gives: % 5.08/1.55 | (9) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : (h(v0) = v1 & g(v1) = v2 & % 5.08/1.55 | big_r(all_3_0, v2) = 0 & big_p(v0) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | DELTA: instantiating (9) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1, all_15_2 % 5.08/1.55 | gives: % 5.08/1.55 | (10) h(all_15_2) = all_15_1 & g(all_15_1) = all_15_0 & big_r(all_3_0, % 5.08/1.55 | all_15_0) = 0 & big_p(all_15_2) = 0 & $i(all_15_0) & $i(all_15_1) & % 5.08/1.55 | $i(all_15_2) % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | ALPHA: (10) implies: % 5.08/1.55 | (11) $i(all_15_2) % 5.08/1.55 | (12) $i(all_15_1) % 5.08/1.55 | (13) $i(all_15_0) % 5.08/1.55 | (14) big_p(all_15_2) = 0 % 5.08/1.55 | (15) big_r(all_3_0, all_15_0) = 0 % 5.08/1.55 | (16) g(all_15_1) = all_15_0 % 5.08/1.55 | (17) h(all_15_2) = all_15_1 % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_15_0, simplifying with (13), (15) % 5.08/1.55 | gives: % 5.08/1.55 | (18) ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & big_p(all_15_0) = v0) % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_15_1, all_15_0, simplifying with (12), % 5.08/1.55 | (16) gives: % 5.08/1.55 | (19) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: any] : % 5.08/1.55 | (h(all_15_1) = v2 & big_p(v2) = v3 & big_p(all_15_0) = v1 & % 5.08/1.55 | big_p(all_15_1) = v0 & $i(v2) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0))) % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_15_2, all_15_1, simplifying with (11), % 5.08/1.55 | (17) gives: % 5.08/1.55 | (20) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : % 5.08/1.55 | (g(all_15_2) = v1 & big_p(v1) = v2 & big_p(all_15_1) = v3 & % 5.08/1.55 | big_p(all_15_2) = v0 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v2 = 0))) % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | DELTA: instantiating (18) with fresh symbol all_22_0 gives: % 5.08/1.55 | (21) ~ (all_22_0 = 0) & big_p(all_15_0) = all_22_0 % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | ALPHA: (21) implies: % 5.08/1.55 | (22) ~ (all_22_0 = 0) % 5.08/1.55 | (23) big_p(all_15_0) = all_22_0 % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_42_0, all_42_1, all_42_2, % 5.08/1.55 | all_42_3 gives: % 5.08/1.55 | (24) g(all_15_2) = all_42_2 & big_p(all_42_2) = all_42_1 & big_p(all_15_1) % 5.08/1.55 | = all_42_0 & big_p(all_15_2) = all_42_3 & $i(all_42_2) & ( ~ (all_42_3 % 5.08/1.55 | = 0) | (all_42_0 = 0 & all_42_1 = 0)) % 5.08/1.55 | % 5.08/1.55 | ALPHA: (24) implies: % 5.08/1.56 | (25) big_p(all_15_2) = all_42_3 % 5.08/1.56 | (26) big_p(all_15_1) = all_42_0 % 5.08/1.56 | (27) ~ (all_42_3 = 0) | (all_42_0 = 0 & all_42_1 = 0) % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_44_0, all_44_1, all_44_2, % 5.08/1.56 | all_44_3 gives: % 5.08/1.56 | (28) h(all_15_1) = all_44_1 & big_p(all_44_1) = all_44_0 & big_p(all_15_0) % 5.08/1.56 | = all_44_2 & big_p(all_15_1) = all_44_3 & $i(all_44_1) & ( ~ (all_44_3 % 5.08/1.56 | = 0) | (all_44_0 = 0 & all_44_2 = 0)) % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 | ALPHA: (28) implies: % 5.08/1.56 | (29) big_p(all_15_1) = all_44_3 % 5.08/1.56 | (30) big_p(all_15_0) = all_44_2 % 5.08/1.56 | (31) ~ (all_44_3 = 0) | (all_44_0 = 0 & all_44_2 = 0) % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, all_42_3, all_15_2, simplifying with % 5.08/1.56 | (14), (25) gives: % 5.08/1.56 | (32) all_42_3 = 0 % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_42_0, all_44_3, all_15_1, simplifying % 5.08/1.56 | with (26), (29) gives: % 5.08/1.56 | (33) all_44_3 = all_42_0 % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_22_0, all_44_2, all_15_0, simplifying % 5.08/1.56 | with (23), (30) gives: % 5.08/1.56 | (34) all_44_2 = all_22_0 % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 | BETA: splitting (31) gives: % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 | Case 1: % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | (35) ~ (all_44_3 = 0) % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | REDUCE: (33), (35) imply: % 5.08/1.56 | | (36) ~ (all_42_0 = 0) % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | BETA: splitting (27) gives: % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | Case 1: % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | | (37) ~ (all_42_3 = 0) % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | | REDUCE: (32), (37) imply: % 5.08/1.56 | | | (38) $false % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | | CLOSE: (38) is inconsistent. % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | Case 2: % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | | (39) all_42_0 = 0 & all_42_1 = 0 % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | | ALPHA: (39) implies: % 5.08/1.56 | | | (40) all_42_0 = 0 % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | | REDUCE: (36), (40) imply: % 5.08/1.56 | | | (41) $false % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | | CLOSE: (41) is inconsistent. % 5.08/1.56 | | | % 5.08/1.56 | | End of split % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | Case 2: % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | (42) all_44_0 = 0 & all_44_2 = 0 % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | ALPHA: (42) implies: % 5.08/1.56 | | (43) all_44_2 = 0 % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | COMBINE_EQS: (34), (43) imply: % 5.08/1.56 | | (44) all_22_0 = 0 % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | SIMP: (44) implies: % 5.08/1.56 | | (45) all_22_0 = 0 % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | REDUCE: (22), (45) imply: % 5.08/1.56 | | (46) $false % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | | CLOSE: (46) is inconsistent. % 5.08/1.56 | | % 5.08/1.56 | End of split % 5.08/1.56 | % 5.08/1.56 End of proof % 5.08/1.56 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 5.08/1.57 % 5.08/1.57 968ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------