↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SYN374+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:36:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.24s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   77 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  28   ~;  47   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (  18 sgn  10   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(x2125,conjecture,
    ( ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
        ( big_p(X1)
      <=> big_p(X2) )
  <=> ( ? [X1] : big_p(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] : big_p(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x2125) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X1] :
        ! [X2] :
          ( big_p(X1)
        <=> big_p(X2) )
    <=> ( ? [X1] : big_p(X1)
      <=> ! [X2] : big_p(X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2125]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X7,X9,X12,X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ( ~ big_p(X9)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | ~ big_p(X7)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_1(X7)) )
      & ( big_p(esk3_0)
        | big_p(X12)
        | ~ big_p(X7)
        | ~ big_p(esk1_1(X7)) )
      & ( ~ big_p(X9)
        | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
        | big_p(X7)
        | big_p(esk1_1(X7)) )
      & ( big_p(esk3_0)
        | big_p(X12)
        | big_p(X7)
        | big_p(esk1_1(X7)) )
      & ( ~ big_p(X15)
        | big_p(X16)
        | ~ big_p(esk4_0)
        | big_p(X14) )
      & ( ~ big_p(esk5_0)
        | big_p(esk6_0)
        | ~ big_p(esk4_0)
        | big_p(X14) )
      & ( ~ big_p(X15)
        | big_p(X16)
        | ~ big_p(X14)
        | big_p(esk4_0) )
      & ( ~ big_p(esk5_0)
        | big_p(esk6_0)
        | ~ big_p(X14)
        | big_p(esk4_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(esk3_0)
    | big_p(X1)
    | big_p(X2)
    | big_p(esk1_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X2)
    | big_p(esk4_0)
    | ~ big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_p(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(esk1_1(X1))
    | big_p(esk3_0)
    | big_p(X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(esk3_0)
    | big_p(esk4_0)
    | ~ big_p(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(esk4_0)
    | big_p(esk3_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(esk4_0)
    | big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_p(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_p(esk2_0)
    | ~ big_p(X2)
    | ~ big_p(esk1_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(esk4_0)
    | big_p(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X2)
    | big_p(X3)
    | ~ big_p(X1)
    | ~ big_p(esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    big_p(esk4_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X1)
    | big_p(X2)
    | ~ big_p(X3) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X1)
    | big_p(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    big_p(X1),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN374+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 08:30:51 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.24/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.24/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.24/1.71  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------