↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN375+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:37:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.04s 20.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  108 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  137 (  49   ~;  65   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (  16 sgn  34   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(x2126,conjecture,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( big_p(X)
      <=> ? [Y] : big_p(Y) )
  <=> ( ! [X] : big_p(X)
    <=> ? [Y] : big_p(Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',x2126) ).

fof(x2126_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X] :
          ( big_p(X)
        <=> ? [Y] : big_p(Y) )
    <=> ( ! [X] : big_p(X)
      <=> ? [Y] : big_p(Y) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2126]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ! [Y] : ~ big_p(Y)
          | ? [X] : ~ big_p(X) )
        & ( ? [X11] : big_p(X11)
          | ! [X10] : big_p(X10) ) )
      | ? [X7] :
          ( ( ! [X9] : ~ big_p(X9)
            | ~ big_p(X7) )
          & ( ? [X8] : big_p(X8)
            | big_p(X7) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ! [X6] : ~ big_p(X6)
          | ! [X5] : big_p(X5) )
        & ( ? [X4] : big_p(X4)
          | ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) ) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ( ! [X2] : ~ big_p(X2)
            | big_p(X0) )
          & ( ? [X1] : big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[x2126_neg]) ).

fof(sk_x2126_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ! [Y] : ~ big_p(Y)
          | ~ big_p(sK3) )
        & ( big_p(sK2)
          | ! [X10] : big_p(X10) ) )
      | ( ( ! [X9] : ~ big_p(X9)
          | ~ big_p(sK0) )
        & ( big_p(sK1)
          | big_p(sK0) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ! [X6] : ~ big_p(X6)
          | ! [X5] : big_p(X5) )
        & ( big_p(sK6)
          | ~ big_p(sK5) ) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ( ! [X2] : ~ big_p(X2)
            | big_p(X0) )
          & ( big_p(sK4(X0))
            | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6,sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X1,sK4(X0)),skolemize(X3,sK5),skolemize(X4,sK6),skolemize(X7,sK0),skolemize(X8,sK1),skolemize(X11,sK2),skolemize(X,sK3)],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_x2126_neg,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ big_p(VAR_1)
        | ~ big_p(sK3)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0)
        | ~ big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( big_p(sK2)
        | big_p(VAR_1)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0)
        | ~ big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ big_p(VAR_0)
        | ~ big_p(sK3)
        | big_p(sK1)
        | big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( big_p(sK2)
        | big_p(VAR_0)
        | big_p(sK1)
        | big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( ~ big_p(VAR_3)
        | big_p(VAR_2)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_1)
        | big_p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( big_p(sK6)
        | ~ big_p(sK5)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_1)
        | big_p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( ~ big_p(VAR_2)
        | big_p(VAR_1)
        | big_p(sK4(VAR_0))
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( big_p(sK6)
        | ~ big_p(sK5)
        | big_p(sK4(VAR_0))
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_x2126_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(D)
    | big_p(C)
    | ~ big_p(B)
    | big_p(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2126_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(sK2)
    | big_p(A)
    | big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2126_neg]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(B)
    | ~ big_p(sK3)
    | ~ big_p(A)
    | ~ big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2126_neg]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(C)
    | ~ big_p(B)
    | big_p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_5]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( big_p(sK2)
    | big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_6]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(A)
    | ~ big_p(sK3)
    | ~ big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_7]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(B)
    | big_p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_13]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK3)
    | ~ big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_16]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(sK0)
    | big_p(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_21]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( big_p(A)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    big_p(sK0),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_23]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ~ big_p(sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ~ big_p(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_24]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SYN375+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/20.54  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/20.54  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/20.54  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/20.54  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/20.54  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/20.54  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/20.54  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/20.54  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:38:58 UTC 2026
% 0.04/20.54  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/20.54  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.04/20.54  % Process 1149748 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.04/20.54  % Sat Sep 26 17:38:58 2026
% 0.04/20.54  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.04/20.54  
% 0.04/20.54  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.04/20.55  
% 0.04/20.55  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.04/20.55  
% 0.04/20.55  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.04/20.55  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.04/20.55  % Level of proof is 10.
% 0.04/20.55  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.04/20.55  % Given clauses 5.
% 0.04/20.55  
% 0.04/20.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------