↑ Up

SuperZenon---0.0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SYN375+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:43:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN375+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:25:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.39  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.12/0.39  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.39  1. (Ex Y, (big_p Y)) (-. (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.39  2. (-. (big_p T_0)) (big_p T_0)   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.39  3. (All X, (big_p X)) (-. (big_p T_0))   ### All 2
% 0.12/0.39  4. ((All X, (big_p X)) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y))) (-. (big_p T_0)) (Ex Y, (big_p Y))   ### Equiv 1 3
% 0.12/0.39  5. (big_p T_0) (-. (big_p T_0))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.39  6. (-. (Ex Y, (big_p Y))) (big_p T_0)   ### NotExists 5
% 0.12/0.39  7. (-. ((big_p T_0) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))) ((All X, (big_p X)) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))   ### NotEquiv 4 6
% 0.12/0.39  8. (-. (All X, ((big_p X) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y))))) ((All X, (big_p X)) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))   ### NotAllEx 7
% 0.12/0.39  9. (Ex Y, (big_p Y)) (-. (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.39  10. (-. (big_p T_1)) (big_p T_1)   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.39  11. ((big_p T_1) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y))) (-. (big_p T_1)) (Ex Y, (big_p Y))   ### Equiv 9 10
% 0.12/0.39  12. (All X, ((big_p X) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))) (Ex Y, (big_p Y)) (-. (big_p T_1))   ### All 11
% 0.12/0.39  13. (-. (All X, (big_p X))) (Ex Y, (big_p Y)) (All X, ((big_p X) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y))))   ### NotAllEx 12
% 0.12/0.39  14. (big_p zenon_X2) (-. (big_p zenon_X2))   ### Axiom
% 0.12/0.39  15. (-. (Ex Y, (big_p Y))) (big_p zenon_X2)   ### NotExists 14
% 0.12/0.39  16. (All X, (big_p X)) (-. (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))   ### All 15
% 0.12/0.39  17. (-. ((All X, (big_p X)) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))) (All X, ((big_p X) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y))))   ### NotEquiv 13 16
% 0.12/0.39  18. (-. ((All X, ((big_p X) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))) <=> ((All X, (big_p X)) <=> (Ex Y, (big_p Y)))))   ### NotEquiv 8 17
% 0.12/0.39  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.12/0.39  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------