%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:27:25 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 2.86s 1.13s % Output : Proof 3.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN376+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 18:39:39 EDT 2023 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.61 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.61 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 1.69/0.94 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 1.69/0.95 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 1.99/0.98 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 1.99/0.98 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 1.99/0.98 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 1.99/0.98 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 1.99/0.98 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.59/1.05 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.59/1.05 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.59/1.05 Prover 2: Proving ... % 2.59/1.05 Prover 5: Proving ... % 2.59/1.05 Prover 6: Proving ... % 2.59/1.05 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.59/1.05 Prover 0: Proving ... % 2.86/1.13 Prover 3: proved (500ms) % 2.86/1.13 % 2.86/1.13 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.86/1.13 % 2.86/1.13 Prover 5: stopped % 2.86/1.14 Prover 6: stopped % 2.86/1.14 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 2.86/1.14 Prover 2: stopped % 3.26/1.16 Prover 0: proved (512ms) % 3.26/1.16 % 3.26/1.16 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 3.26/1.16 % 3.26/1.16 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 3.26/1.16 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 3.26/1.16 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 3.26/1.16 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 3.26/1.16 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.26/1.16 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 3.26/1.16 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 3.26/1.16 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 3.26/1.16 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 3.26/1.17 Prover 4: Found proof (size 9) % 3.26/1.17 Prover 4: proved (534ms) % 3.26/1.17 Prover 1: Found proof (size 14) % 3.26/1.17 Prover 1: proved (543ms) % 3.26/1.17 Prover 7: stopped % 3.26/1.17 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 3.26/1.17 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 3.26/1.18 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 3.26/1.18 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.26/1.18 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 3.26/1.18 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 3.26/1.18 Prover 8: stopped % 3.26/1.18 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.26/1.18 Prover 13: stopped % 3.26/1.18 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.26/1.19 Prover 10: stopped % 3.26/1.20 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.26/1.20 Prover 11: stopped % 3.26/1.20 % 3.26/1.20 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 3.26/1.20 % 3.53/1.20 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 3.53/1.20 Assumptions after simplification: % 3.53/1.20 --------------------------------- % 3.53/1.21 % 3.53/1.21 (x2127) % 3.53/1.24 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: int] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: any] : ( ~ % 3.53/1.24 (v2 = 0) & big_p(v3) = v4 & big_p(v1) = v2 & big_p(v0) = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v1) % 3.53/1.24 & $i(v0) & ! [v5: $i] : ! [v6: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) | v6 = 0 | ~ % 3.53/1.24 (big_p(v5) = v6) | ~ $i(v5)) & ! [v5: $i] : (v4 = 0 | ~ (big_p(v5) = 0) % 3.53/1.24 | ~ $i(v5))) % 3.53/1.24 % 3.53/1.24 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 3.53/1.24 --------------------------------- % 3.53/1.24 % 3.53/1.24 Begin of proof % 3.53/1.24 | % 3.53/1.25 | DELTA: instantiating (x2127) with fresh symbols all_3_0, all_3_1, all_3_2, % 3.53/1.25 | all_3_3, all_3_4 gives: % 3.53/1.25 | (1) ~ (all_3_2 = 0) & big_p(all_3_1) = all_3_0 & big_p(all_3_3) = all_3_2 % 3.53/1.25 | & big_p(all_3_4) = 0 & $i(all_3_1) & $i(all_3_3) & $i(all_3_4) & ! % 3.53/1.25 | [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : ( ~ (all_3_0 = 0) | v1 = 0 | ~ (big_p(v0) = % 3.53/1.25 | v1) | ~ $i(v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : (all_3_0 = 0 | ~ (big_p(v0) = 0) % 3.53/1.25 | | ~ $i(v0)) % 3.53/1.25 | % 3.53/1.25 | ALPHA: (1) implies: % 3.53/1.25 | (2) ~ (all_3_2 = 0) % 3.53/1.25 | (3) $i(all_3_4) % 3.53/1.25 | (4) $i(all_3_3) % 3.53/1.25 | (5) big_p(all_3_4) = 0 % 3.53/1.25 | (6) big_p(all_3_3) = all_3_2 % 3.53/1.25 | (7) ! [v0: $i] : (all_3_0 = 0 | ~ (big_p(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0)) % 3.53/1.26 | (8) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : ( ~ (all_3_0 = 0) | v1 = 0 | ~ (big_p(v0) % 3.53/1.26 | = v1) | ~ $i(v0)) % 3.53/1.26 | % 3.53/1.26 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_3_4, simplifying with (3), (5) gives: % 3.53/1.26 | (9) all_3_0 = 0 % 3.53/1.26 | % 3.53/1.26 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_3_3, all_3_2, simplifying with (4), % 3.53/1.26 | (6) gives: % 3.53/1.26 | (10) ~ (all_3_0 = 0) | all_3_2 = 0 % 3.53/1.26 | % 3.53/1.26 | BETA: splitting (10) gives: % 3.53/1.26 | % 3.53/1.26 | Case 1: % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | | (11) ~ (all_3_0 = 0) % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | | REDUCE: (9), (11) imply: % 3.53/1.26 | | (12) $false % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | | CLOSE: (12) is inconsistent. % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | Case 2: % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | | (13) all_3_2 = 0 % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | | REDUCE: (2), (13) imply: % 3.53/1.26 | | (14) $false % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | | CLOSE: (14) is inconsistent. % 3.53/1.26 | | % 3.53/1.26 | End of split % 3.53/1.26 | % 3.53/1.26 End of proof % 3.53/1.26 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 3.53/1.26 % 3.53/1.26 654ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------