↑ Up

Twee---2.7.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SYN376+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:47:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.24s
% Output   : Proof 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN376+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.16  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.16  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.16  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.16  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.16  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.16  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.16  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.16  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:50:46 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.17  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.24  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.07/0.24  Axiom 1 (x2127): big_p(x) = true.
% 0.07/0.24  Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.07/0.24  Axiom 3 (x2127_1): ifeq(big_p(X), true, big_p(x3), true) = true.
% 0.07/0.24  Axiom 4 (x2127_2): ifeq(big_p(x3), true, big_p(X), true) = true.
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  Goal 1 (x2127_3): big_p(x2) = true.
% 0.07/0.24  Proof:
% 0.07/0.24    big_p(x2)
% 0.07/0.24  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.07/0.24    ifeq(true, true, big_p(x2), true)
% 0.07/0.24  = { by axiom 3 (x2127_1) R->L }
% 0.07/0.24    ifeq(ifeq(big_p(x), true, big_p(x3), true), true, big_p(x2), true)
% 0.07/0.24  = { by axiom 1 (x2127) }
% 0.07/0.24    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, big_p(x3), true), true, big_p(x2), true)
% 0.07/0.24  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.07/0.24    ifeq(big_p(x3), true, big_p(x2), true)
% 0.07/0.24  = { by axiom 4 (x2127_2) }
% 0.07/0.24    true
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.07/0.24  
% 0.07/0.24  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------