↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN377+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:37:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 5.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  105 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  133 (  47   ~;  63   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (  15 sgn  36   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(x2128,conjecture,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( big_p(X)
      <=> ! [Y] : big_p(Y) )
  <=> ( ? [X] : big_p(X)
    <=> ! [Y] : big_p(Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',x2128) ).

fof(x2128_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X] :
          ( big_p(X)
        <=> ! [Y] : big_p(Y) )
    <=> ( ? [X] : big_p(X)
      <=> ! [Y] : big_p(Y) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2128]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ? [Y] : ~ big_p(Y)
          | ! [X] : ~ big_p(X) )
        & ( ! [X11] : big_p(X11)
          | ? [X10] : big_p(X10) ) )
      | ? [X7] :
          ( ( ? [X9] : ~ big_p(X9)
            | ~ big_p(X7) )
          & ( ! [X8] : big_p(X8)
            | big_p(X7) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ? [X6] : ~ big_p(X6)
          | ? [X5] : big_p(X5) )
        & ( ! [X4] : big_p(X4)
          | ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) ) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ( ? [X2] : ~ big_p(X2)
            | big_p(X0) )
          & ( ! [X1] : big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[x2128_neg]) ).

fof(sk_x2128_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ~ big_p(sK3)
          | ! [X] : ~ big_p(X) )
        & ( ! [X11] : big_p(X11)
          | big_p(sK1) ) )
      | ( ( ~ big_p(sK2)
          | ~ big_p(sK0) )
        & ( ! [X8] : big_p(X8)
          | big_p(sK0) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ~ big_p(sK6)
          | big_p(sK5) )
        & ( ! [X4] : big_p(X4)
          | ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) ) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(sK4(X0))
            | big_p(X0) )
          & ( ! [X1] : big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6,sK0,sK2,sK1,sK3]),skolemize(X2,sK4(X0)),skolemize(X5,sK5),skolemize(X6,sK6),skolemize(X7,sK0),skolemize(X9,sK2),skolemize(X10,sK1),skolemize(Y,sK3)],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_x2128_neg,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK3)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0)
        | ~ big_p(sK2)
        | ~ big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( big_p(VAR_0)
        | big_p(sK1)
        | ~ big_p(sK2)
        | ~ big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK3)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_1)
        | big_p(VAR_0)
        | big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( big_p(VAR_1)
        | big_p(sK1)
        | big_p(VAR_0)
        | big_p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK6)
        | big_p(sK5)
        | ~ big_p(sK4(VAR_0))
        | big_p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( big_p(VAR_2)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_1)
        | ~ big_p(sK4(VAR_0))
        | big_p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK6)
        | big_p(sK5)
        | big_p(VAR_1)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( big_p(VAR_3)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_2)
        | big_p(VAR_1)
        | ~ big_p(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_x2128_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(D)
    | ~ big_p(C)
    | big_p(B)
    | ~ big_p(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2128_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(B)
    | big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(A)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2128_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(sK3)
    | ~ big_p(A)
    | ~ big_p(sK2)
    | ~ big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2128_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    ( big_p(C)
    | big_p(B)
    | ~ big_p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( big_p(A)
    | big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_3]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK3)
    | ~ big_p(sK2)
    | ~ big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( big_p(B)
    | ~ big_p(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_5]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_7]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( big_p(A)
    | big_p(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    big_p(sK0),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_11]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK3)
    | ~ big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    big_p(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ~ big_p(sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_16]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SYN377+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/5.46  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/5.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/5.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/5.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/5.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/5.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/5.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/5.46  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:39:08 UTC 2026
% 0.18/5.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/5.47  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/5.47  % Process 2671377 was started by sandbox2 on n005,
% 0.18/5.47  % Sat Sep 26 17:39:08 2026
% 0.18/5.47  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/5.47  
% 0.18/5.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.18/5.49  
% 0.18/5.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/5.49  
% 0.18/5.49  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.18/5.49  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.18/5.49  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.18/5.49  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.18/5.49  % Given clauses 4.
% 0.18/5.49  
% 0.18/5.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------