↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SYN380+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:36:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN380+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 08:30:26 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.25/1.62  fof(x2132, conjecture, (![X1]:~(big_r(X1,X1))=>?[X2, X3]:(~(big_r(X2,X3))&(big_q(X3,X2)=>![X4]:big_q(X4,X4)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', x2132)).
% 0.25/1.62  fof(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((![X1]:~big_r(X1,X1)=>?[X2, X3]:(~big_r(X2,X3)&(big_q(X3,X2)=>![X4]:big_q(X4,X4))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2132])])).
% 0.25/1.62  fof(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X9, X10, X11]:(~big_r(X9,X9)&((big_q(X11,X10)|big_r(X10,X11))&(~big_q(esk1_2(X10,X11),esk1_2(X10,X11))|big_r(X10,X11)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_1])])])])])).
% 0.25/1.62  cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (big_r(X1,X2)|~big_q(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]), ['final']).
% 0.25/1.62  cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (big_q(X1,X2)|big_r(X2,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]), ['final']).
% 0.25/1.62  cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~big_r(X1,X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]), ['final']).
% 0.25/1.64  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (big_q(X1,X1)), inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_5,i_0_4])).
% 0.25/1.64  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (big_r(X1,X2)|big_q(X2,X1)), inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_4])).
% 0.25/1.64  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (big_r(X1,X2)), inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_5,i_0_4,i_0_3])).
% 0.25/1.64  cnf(i_0_9,plain, ($false), inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0+5, i_0_8]), ['proof']).
% 0.25/1.64  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.25/1.64  % Total time : 1.272s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------