%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:23 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.58s 0.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.58s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 18:46:54 EDT 2024 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.22/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.58/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.58/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.58/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.58/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.58/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.58/0.61 % 0.58/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.58/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.58/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.62 % File : SYN386+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.58/0.62 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.58/0.62 % Problem : Peter Andrews Problem X2138 % 0.58/0.62 % Version : Especial. % 0.58/0.62 % English : % 0.58/0.62 % 0.58/0.62 % Refs : [And86] Andrews (1986), An Introduction to Mathematical Logic % 0.58/0.62 % : [And94] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.58/0.62 % Source : [And94] % 0.58/0.62 % Names : X2138 [And86] % 0.58/0.62 % 0.58/0.62 % Status : Theorem % 0.58/0.62 % Rating : 0.12 v8.2.0, 0.20 v8.1.0, 0.21 v7.5.0, 0.14 v7.4.0, 0.19 v7.3.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.23 v6.2.0, 0.27 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.21 v4.0.0, 0.20 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.11 v3.2.0, 0.22 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 0.58/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.58/0.62 % Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ) % 0.58/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 10 avg) % 0.58/0.62 % Number of connectives : 9 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 3 &) % 0.58/0.62 % ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.58/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 13 avg) % 0.58/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.58/0.62 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 0.58/0.62 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.58/0.62 % Number of variables : 17 ( 11 !; 6 ?) % 0.58/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 0.58/0.62 % 0.58/0.62 % Comments : % 0.58/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.62 fof(x2138,conjecture, % 0.58/0.62 ( ( ! [X] : % 0.58/0.62 ? [Y] : big_f(X,Y) % 0.58/0.62 & ? [X] : % 0.58/0.62 ! [E] : % 0.58/0.62 ? [N] : % 0.58/0.62 ! [W] : % 0.58/0.62 ( big_s(N,W) % 0.58/0.62 => big_d(W,X,E) ) % 0.58/0.62 & ! [E] : % 0.58/0.62 ? [D] : % 0.58/0.62 ! [A,B] : % 0.58/0.62 ( big_d(A,B,D) % 0.58/0.62 => ! [Y,Z] : % 0.58/0.62 ( ( big_f(A,Y) % 0.58/0.62 & big_f(B,Z) ) % 0.58/0.62 => big_d(Y,Z,E) ) ) ) % 0.58/0.62 => ? [Y] : % 0.58/0.62 ! [E] : % 0.58/0.62 ? [M] : % 0.58/0.62 ! [W] : % 0.58/0.62 ( big_s(M,W) % 0.58/0.62 => ! [Z] : % 0.58/0.62 ( big_f(W,Z) % 0.58/0.62 => big_d(Z,Y,E) ) ) ) ). % 0.58/0.62 % 0.58/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.62 % Proof found % 0.58/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.58/0.62 % SZS output start Proof % 0.58/0.62 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.58/0.62 %VarNum:27(SingletonVarNum:14) % 0.58/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.58/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.58/0.62 %SharedTerms:1 % 0.58/0.62 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 % 0.58/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:4 % 0.58/0.62 [1]P1(x11,f1(x11)) % 0.58/0.62 [2]P3(x21,f2(x22,x21)) % 0.58/0.62 [3]P1(f2(x31,x32),f7(x31,x32)) % 0.58/0.62 [4]~P2(f7(x41,x42),x41,f3(x41)) % 0.58/0.62 [5]P2(x51,a4,x52)+~P3(f5(x52),x51) % 0.58/0.62 [6]P2(x61,x62,x63)+~P1(x64,x62)+~P1(x65,x61)+~P2(x65,x64,f6(x63)) % 0.58/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.58/0.62 % 0.58/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.58/0.62 cnf(10,plain, % 0.58/0.62 ($false), % 0.58/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,3,2,5,6]), % 0.58/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.58/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.58/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------