↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:37:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.02s 0.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  24   ~;  19   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  100 (   6 sgn  56   !;  19   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(x2138,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [E] :
        ? [D] :
        ! [A,B] :
          ( big_d(A,B,D)
         => ! [Y,Z] :
              ( ( big_f(B,Z)
                & big_f(A,Y) )
             => big_d(Y,Z,E) ) )
      & ? [X] :
        ! [E] :
        ? [N] :
        ! [W] :
          ( big_s(N,W)
         => big_d(W,X,E) )
      & ! [X] :
        ? [Y] : big_f(X,Y) )
   => ? [Y] :
      ! [E] :
      ? [M] :
      ! [W] :
        ( big_s(M,W)
       => ! [Z] :
            ( big_f(W,Z)
           => big_d(Z,Y,E) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',x2138) ).

fof(x2138_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [E] :
          ? [D] :
          ! [A,B] :
            ( big_d(A,B,D)
           => ! [Y,Z] :
                ( ( big_f(B,Z)
                  & big_f(A,Y) )
               => big_d(Y,Z,E) ) )
        & ? [X] :
          ! [E] :
          ? [N] :
          ! [W] :
            ( big_s(N,W)
           => big_d(W,X,E) )
        & ! [X] :
          ? [Y] : big_f(X,Y) )
     => ? [Y] :
        ! [E] :
        ? [M] :
        ! [W] :
          ( big_s(M,W)
         => ! [Z] :
              ( big_f(W,Z)
             => big_d(Z,Y,E) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[x2138]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ( ! [Y] :
      ? [E] :
      ! [M] :
      ? [W] :
        ( ? [Z] :
            ( ~ big_d(Z,Y,E)
            & big_f(W,Z) )
        & big_s(M,W) )
    & ! [X4] :
      ? [D] :
      ! [A,B] :
        ( ! [X5,X6] :
            ( big_d(X5,X6,X4)
            | ~ big_f(B,X6)
            | ~ big_f(A,X5) )
        | ~ big_d(A,B,D) )
    & ? [X] :
      ! [X2] :
      ? [N] :
      ! [X3] :
        ( big_d(X3,X,X2)
        | ~ big_s(N,X3) )
    & ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] : big_f(X0,X1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[x2138_neg]) ).

fof(sk_x2138_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ! [Y,M] :
        ( ~ big_d(sK3(Y,M),Y,sK4(Y))
        & big_f(sK0(Y,M),sK3(Y,M))
        & big_s(M,sK0(Y,M)) )
    & ! [X4,A,B] :
        ( ! [X5,X6] :
            ( big_d(X5,X6,X4)
            | ~ big_f(B,X6)
            | ~ big_f(A,X5) )
        | ~ big_d(A,B,sK5(X4)) )
    & ! [X2,X3] :
        ( big_d(X3,sK2,X2)
        | ~ big_s(sK1(X2),X3) )
    & ! [X0] : big_f(X0,sK6(X0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6,sK1,sK2,sK5,sK0,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X1,sK6(X0)),skolemize(X,sK2),skolemize(N,sK1(X2)),skolemize(D,sK5(X4)),skolemize(E,sK4(Y)),skolemize(W,sK0(Y,M)),skolemize(Z,sK3(Y,M))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_x2138_neg,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : ~ big_d(sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0,sK4(VAR_0))
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : big_f(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),sK3(VAR_0,VAR_1))
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : big_s(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_1,VAR_0))
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] :
        ( big_d(VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_2)
        | ~ big_f(VAR_1,VAR_4)
        | ~ big_f(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ big_d(VAR_0,VAR_1,sK5(VAR_2)) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( big_d(VAR_1,sK2,VAR_0)
        | ~ big_s(sK1(VAR_0),VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0] : big_f(VAR_0,sK6(VAR_0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_x2138_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    big_s(A,sK0(B,A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2138_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_d(B,sK2,A)
    | ~ big_s(sK1(A),B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2138_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    big_d(sK0(A,sK1(B)),sK2,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ big_d(sK3(A,B),A,sK4(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2138_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(sK0(A,B),sK3(A,B)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2138_neg]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_d(D,E,C)
    | ~ big_f(B,E)
    | ~ big_f(A,D)
    | ~ big_d(A,B,sK5(C)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2138_neg]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    big_f(A,sK6(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_x2138_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_d(C,D,B)
    | ~ big_f(sK2,D)
    | ~ big_f(sK0(A,sK1(sK5(B))),C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_d(sK3(B,sK1(sK5(C))),A,C)
    | ~ big_f(sK2,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    big_d(sK3(A,sK1(sK5(B))),sK6(sK2),B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SYN386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.02/0.29  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 17:39:19 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.30  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.02/0.30  % Process 1150506 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.02/0.30  % Sat Sep 26 17:39:19 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.02/0.31  
% 0.02/0.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.02/0.31  
% 0.02/0.31  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.02/0.31  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.02/0.31  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.02/0.31  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.02/0.31  % Given clauses 5.
% 0.02/0.31  
% 0.02/0.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------