%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN389+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:24 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.52s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SYN389+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.07/0.11 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 21:09:24 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime : % 0.52/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.52/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.52/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.52/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.52/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.52/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 % File : SYN389+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.52/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.52/0.60 % Problem : Pierce's Law % 0.52/0.60 % Version : Especial. % 0.52/0.60 % Theorem formulation : 1 proposition. % 0.52/0.60 % English : Pierce's Law. Unprovable by Logic Theorist, and tricky % 0.52/0.60 % for 'natural' systems. % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Refs : [NS72] Newell & Simon (1972), Human Problem Solving % 0.52/0.60 % : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au % 0.52/0.60 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.52/0.60 % Source : [Hah94] % 0.52/0.60 % Names : Pelletier 8 [Pel86] % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Status : Theorem % 0.52/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 0.52/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of atoms : 4 ( 0 equ) % 0.52/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 4 avg) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of connectives : 3 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 0 &) % 0.52/0.60 % ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.52/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 4 avg) % 0.52/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-0 aty) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?) % 0.52/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_PRP % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Comments : The clausal form of this problem is the same as SYN001+1.p. % 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 fof(pel8,conjecture, % 0.52/0.60 ( ( ( p % 0.52/0.60 => q ) % 0.52/0.60 => p ) % 0.52/0.60 => p ) ). % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 % Proof found % 0.52/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.52/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.52/0.60 %ClaNum:3(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.52/0.60 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0) % 0.52/0.60 %MaxLitNum:1 % 0.52/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.52/0.60 %SharedTerms:4 % 0.52/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 % 0.52/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.52/0.60 [1]P1(a5000) % 0.52/0.60 [2]~P1(a5000) % 0.52/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.61 cnf(4,plain, % 0.52/0.61 ($false), % 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2]), % 0.52/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.52/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.52/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------