↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN395+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:26 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem    : SYN395+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.27  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.27  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.27  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 18:47:23 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.27  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.45  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.47  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.47  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.13/0.47  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.47  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.13/0.47  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.13/0.47  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.47  
% 0.13/0.47  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.13/0.47  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.13/0.47  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48  % File     : SYN395+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.13/0.48  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.13/0.48  % Problem  : Kalish and Montague Problem 202
% 0.13/0.48  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.13/0.48  % English  : Laws of distribution.
% 0.13/0.48  
% 0.13/0.48  % Refs     : [KM64]  Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.13/0.48  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.13/0.48  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.13/0.48  % Names    : kalish202 [Hah94]
% 0.13/0.48  
% 0.13/0.48  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.13/0.48  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.13/0.48  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   0 equ)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Number of connectives :    3 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.13/0.48  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.13/0.48  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   1   !;   2   ?)
% 0.13/0.48  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.13/0.48  
% 0.13/0.48  % Comments :
% 0.13/0.48  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48  fof(kalish202,conjecture,
% 0.13/0.48      ( ! [X] :
% 0.13/0.48          ( f(X)
% 0.13/0.48         => g(X) )
% 0.13/0.48     => ( ? [Y] : f(Y)
% 0.13/0.48       => ? [Z] : g(Z) ) ) ).
% 0.13/0.48  
% 0.13/0.48  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48  % Proof found
% 0.13/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.48  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.48  %ClaNum:3(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.13/0.48  %VarNum:3(SingletonVarNum:2)
% 0.13/0.48  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.13/0.48  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.13/0.48  %SharedTerms:2
% 0.13/0.48  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.13/0.48  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.13/0.48  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.13/0.48  [2]~P2(x21)
% 0.13/0.48  [3]~P1(x31)+P2(x31)
% 0.13/0.48  %EqnAxiom
% 0.13/0.48  
% 0.13/0.48  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48  cnf(4,plain,
% 0.13/0.48     ($false),
% 0.13/0.48     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3]),
% 0.13/0.48     ['proof']).
% 0.13/0.48  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.48  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------