↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:26 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 20:42:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.54/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.54/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.54/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.54/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  % File     : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.54/0.60  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.54/0.60  % Problem  : Kalish and Montague Problem 215
% 0.54/0.60  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.54/0.60  % English  : Laws of confinement.
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  % Refs     : [KM64]  Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.54/0.60  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.54/0.60  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.54/0.60  % Names    : kalish215 [Hah94]
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.54/0.60  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.54/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   0 equ)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Number of connectives :    3 (   0   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
% 0.54/0.60  %                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   4 avg)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.54/0.60  %            Number of variables   :    2 (   2   !;   0   ?)
% 0.54/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  % Comments :
% 0.54/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  fof(kalish215,conjecture,
% 0.54/0.60      ( ! [X] :
% 0.54/0.60          ( p
% 0.54/0.60          & f(X) )
% 0.54/0.60    <=> ( p
% 0.54/0.60        & ! [Y] : f(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.54/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.54/0.60  %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.54/0.60  %VarNum:2(SingletonVarNum:2)
% 0.54/0.60  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.54/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.54/0.60  %SharedTerms:7
% 0.54/0.60  %goalClause: 1 4 5
% 0.54/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.54/0.60  [1]P1(a5000)
% 0.54/0.60  [4]P2(x41)+P2(x42)
% 0.54/0.60  [5]~P1(a5000)+~P2(a1)+~P2(a2)
% 0.54/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61  cnf(8,plain,
% 0.54/0.61     (~P2(a2)),
% 0.54/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,4])).
% 0.54/0.61  cnf(10,plain,
% 0.54/0.61     ($false),
% 0.54/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,4]),
% 0.54/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.54/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------