↑ Up

Drodi---4.1.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi---4.1.1
% Problem  : SYN398+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:15:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   1 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  103 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  105 (  37   ~;  40   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   8 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (  17   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( f(X)
        & p )
  <=> ( ! [Y] : f(Y)
      & p ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X] :
          ( f(X)
          & p )
    <=> ( ! [Y] : f(Y)
        & p ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( f(X)
        & p )
  <~> ( ! [Y] : f(Y)
      & p ) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,definition,
    ( sP0_prd
  <=> ( ! [Y] : f(Y)
      & p ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP0_prd])],[]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( f(X)
        & p )
  <~> sP0_prd ),
    inference(formula_renaming,[status(thm)],[f3,f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP0_prd
      | ? [X] :
          ( ~ f(X)
          | ~ p ) )
    & ( sP0_prd
      | ! [X] :
          ( f(X)
          & p ) ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP0_prd
      | ? [X] : ~ f(X)
      | ~ p )
    & ( sP0_prd
      | ( ! [X] : f(X)
        & p ) ) ),
    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ( ~ sP0_prd
      | ~ f(sK0_skl)
      | ~ p )
    & ( sP0_prd
      | ( ! [X] : f(X)
        & p ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0_skl]),skolemize(X,sK0_skl)],[f7]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( sP0_prd
    | p ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sP0_prd
      | f(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ~ sP0_prd
    | ~ f(sK0_skl)
    | ~ p ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ( ? [Y] : ~ f(Y)
      | ~ p
      | sP0_prd )
    & ( ( ! [Y] : f(Y)
        & p )
      | ~ sP0_prd ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ( ~ f(sK1_skl)
      | ~ p
      | sP0_prd )
    & ( ( ! [Y] : f(Y)
        & p )
      | ~ sP0_prd ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1_skl]),skolemize(Y,sK1_skl)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( p
    | ~ sP0_prd ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( f(X0)
      | ~ sP0_prd ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK1_skl)
    | ~ p
    | sP0_prd ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

fof(f17,definition,
    ( sQ0_spl
  <=> p ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ0_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f20,definition,
    ( sQ1_spl
  <=> sP0_prd ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ1_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( sQ1_spl
    | sQ0_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f9,f17,f20]) ).

fof(f24,definition,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sQ2_spl
    <=> f(X0) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ2_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ sQ2_spl
      | f(X0) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( sQ1_spl
    | sQ2_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f10,f24,f20]) ).

fof(f28,definition,
    ( sQ3_spl
  <=> f(sK0_skl) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ3_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( sQ3_spl
    | ~ f(sK0_skl) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( ~ sQ1_spl
    | ~ sQ3_spl
    | ~ sQ0_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f11,f17,f28,f20]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ( sQ0_spl
    | ~ sQ1_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f14,f20,f17]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( sQ2_spl
    | ~ sQ1_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f15,f20,f24]) ).

fof(f34,definition,
    ( sQ4_spl
  <=> f(sK1_skl) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ4_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( sQ4_spl
    | ~ f(sK1_skl) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f34]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( ~ sQ4_spl
    | ~ sQ0_spl
    | sQ1_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f16,f20,f17,f34]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( sQ4_spl
    | ~ sQ2_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f36,f25]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ( sQ4_spl
    | ~ sQ2_spl ),
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( sQ3_spl
    | ~ sQ2_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f30,f25]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ( sQ3_spl
    | ~ sQ2_spl ),
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f23,f27,f31,f32,f33,f37,f39,f41]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN398+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:52:50 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.13/0.40  % Refutation found
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.13/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.42  % Elapsed time: 0.043754 seconds
% 0.13/0.42  % CPU time: 0.114244 seconds
% 0.13/0.42  % Total memory used: 16.525 MB
% 0.13/0.42  % Net memory used: 15.934 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------