%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN400+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:33:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 3 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 sgn 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kalish227,conjecture,
( ! [X1] : p
<=> p ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish227) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1] : p
<=> p ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[kalish227]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN400+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:53:25 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.51 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.51 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % new_bool_3 with pid 1723205 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.25/0.51 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.51 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.51 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.51 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1723210 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.51 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.51 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.51 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.51 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.51 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/0.51
% 0.25/0.51 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.51 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/0.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.51 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.25/0.51 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.51 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.25/0.51 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.51 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.51 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.51 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.51 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.51 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.51 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.51 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.51 % Termbank termtop insertions : 30
% 0.25/0.51 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4
% 0.25/0.51
% 0.25/0.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.51 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/0.51 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/0.51 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.51 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.25/0.51
% 0.25/0.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.51 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.51 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/0.51 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.25/0.51 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.25/0.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------