↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN403+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:07:36 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.75s 5.00s
% Output   : Proof 4.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.14  % Problem    : SYN403+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.10/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:05:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.75/5.00  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.75/5.00  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (X : Iota), And (f X → g X) (g X → h X) → f X → h X)) True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), And (f X → g X) (g X → h X) → f X → h X) False
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 4.75/5.00    Eq (Not (And (f (skS.0 0 a) → g (skS.0 0 a)) (g (skS.0 0 a) → h (skS.0 0 a)) → f (skS.0 0 a) → h (skS.0 0 a))) True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 4.75/5.00    Eq (And (f (skS.0 0 a) → g (skS.0 0 a)) (g (skS.0 0 a) → h (skS.0 0 a)) → f (skS.0 0 a) → h (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (f (skS.0 0 a) → g (skS.0 0 a)) (g (skS.0 0 a) → h (skS.0 0 a))) True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (f (skS.0 0 a) → h (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (g (skS.0 0 a) → h (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #7 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (f (skS.0 0 a) → g (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) False) (Eq (h (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #9 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #10 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (h (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #11 (by backward demodulation #[10, 8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) False) (Eq False True)
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #12 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (f (skS.0 0 a)) False) (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #13 (by forward demodulation #[12, 9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #15 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #16 (by superposition #[15, 14]): Eq False True
% 4.75/5.00  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): False
% 4.75/5.00  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------