↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : SYN403+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:34:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.76s 6.18s
% Output   : Proof 5.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  12   ~;   6   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   2 sgn   2   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f0,conjecture,
    ! [X] :
      ( ( ( g(X)
         => h(X) )
        & ( f(X)
         => g(X) ) )
     => ( f(X)
       => h(X) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish234) ).

fof(f0_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X] :
        ( ( ( g(X)
           => h(X) )
          & ( f(X)
           => g(X) ) )
       => ( f(X)
         => h(X) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f0]) ).

fof(f0_nnf,plain,
    ? [X] :
      ( ~ h(X)
      & f(X)
      & ( h(X)
        | ~ g(X) )
      & ( g(X)
        | ~ f(X) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f0_neg]) ).

fof(f0_sk,plain,
    ( ~ h(sk0)
    & f(sk0)
    & ( h(sk0)
      | ~ g(sk0) )
    & ( g(sk0)
      | ~ f(sk0) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk0])],[f0_nnf]) ).

cnf(c1,plain,
    ( h(sk0)
    | ~ g(sk0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    ifeq(g(sk0),true,h(sk0),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c1]) ).

cnf(c0,plain,
    ( g(sk0)
    | ~ f(sk0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi0,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(f(sk0),true,g(sk0),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c0]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    f(sk0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi2,negated_conjecture,
    f(sk0) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c2]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    g(sk0) = true,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi0,hi2]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    g(sk0) = true,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t1]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    ifeq(true,true,h(sk0),true) = true,
    inference(step,[status(thm)],[t5,t7]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    introduced(definition) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    h(sk0) = true,
    inference(step,[status(thm)],[t9,t6]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    h(sk0) = true,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t10]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ~ h(sk0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(goal_0,negated_conjecture,
    h(sk0) != true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c3]) ).

cnf(g0_0,plain,
    true != true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[goal_0,t8]) ).

cnf(contradiction_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[g0_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN403+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/5.38  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:08:15 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.39  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 5.76/6.18  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.76/6.18  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------