%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SYN403+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:27:33 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 2.06s 0.95s % Output : Proof 2.47s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SYN403+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0. % 0.00/0.10 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:55:44 EDT 2023 % 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime : % 0.15/0.52 ________ _____ % 0.15/0.52 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.15/0.52 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.15/0.52 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.15/0.52 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.15/0.52 (2023-06-19) % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.15/0.52 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.15/0.52 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.15/0.52 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.15/0.52 % 0.15/0.52 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.15/0.53 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.15/0.54 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.15/0.54 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.15/0.54 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.15/0.54 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.15/0.54 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.15/0.54 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.15/0.54 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 0.15/0.84 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 0.15/0.84 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 1.40/0.89 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 1.40/0.89 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 1.40/0.89 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 1.40/0.89 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 1.40/0.89 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 1.40/0.92 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 1.40/0.92 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 1.40/0.92 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 1.40/0.92 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.03/0.92 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.92 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.93 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.94 Prover 3: proved (406ms) % 2.06/0.94 Prover 0: proved (409ms) % 2.06/0.94 Prover 5: proved (402ms) % 2.06/0.94 Prover 2: proved (409ms) % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 Prover 6: proved (402ms) % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/0.95 % 2.06/0.95 Prover 4: Found proof (size 1) % 2.06/0.95 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1) % 2.06/0.95 Prover 4: proved (408ms) % 2.06/0.95 Prover 1: proved (412ms) % 2.06/0.95 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 2.06/0.95 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 2.06/0.95 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 2.06/0.95 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 2.06/0.95 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 2.06/0.96 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.96 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.96 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.97 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.97 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.97 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.97 Prover 10: stopped % 2.06/0.97 Prover 7: stopped % 2.06/0.98 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 2.06/0.98 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.98 Prover 8: stopped % 2.06/0.98 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/0.98 Prover 13: stopped % 2.06/1.00 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.06/1.00 Prover 11: stopped % 2.06/1.00 % 2.06/1.00 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.06/1.00 % 2.47/1.00 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 2.47/1.01 Assumptions after simplification: % 2.47/1.01 --------------------------------- % 2.47/1.01 % 2.47/1.01 (kalish234) % 2.47/1.01 $false % 2.47/1.01 % 2.47/1.01 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 2.47/1.01 --------------------------------- % 2.47/1.01 % 2.47/1.01 Begin of proof % 2.47/1.01 | % 2.47/1.01 | CLOSE: (kalish234) is inconsistent. % 2.47/1.01 | % 2.47/1.01 End of proof % 2.47/1.01 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 2.47/1.01 % 2.47/1.01 494ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------