%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN403+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:48:09 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 40 ( 13 ~; 8 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kalish234,conjecture,
! [X] :
( ( ( f(X)
=> g(X) )
& ( g(X)
=> h(X) ) )
=> ( f(X)
=> h(X) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish234) ).
fof(c0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X] :
( ( ( f(X)
=> g(X) )
& ( g(X)
=> h(X) ) )
=> ( f(X)
=> h(X) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[kalish234]) ).
fof(c1,negated_conjecture,
? [X] :
( ( ~ f(X)
| g(X) )
& ( ~ g(X)
| h(X) )
& f(X)
& ~ h(X) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0]) ).
fof(c2,negated_conjecture,
? [X2] :
( ( ~ f(X2)
| g(X2) )
& ( ~ g(X2)
| h(X2) )
& f(X2)
& ~ h(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c1]) ).
fof(c3,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ f(skolem0001)
| g(skolem0001) )
& ( ~ g(skolem0001)
| h(skolem0001) )
& f(skolem0001)
& ~ h(skolem0001) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c2]) ).
cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,
~ h(skolem0001),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3]) ).
cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,
f(skolem0001),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3]) ).
cnf(c4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(skolem0001)
| g(skolem0001) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3]) ).
cnf(c8,plain,
g(skolem0001),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4,c6]) ).
cnf(c5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(skolem0001)
| h(skolem0001) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3]) ).
cnf(c9,plain,
h(skolem0001),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5,c8]) ).
cnf(c10,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9,c7]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SYN403+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed May 8 20:26:22 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.53 % Version: 1.5
% 0.21/0.53 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.53 % Processed clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.53 % Factors computed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 % Resolvents computed: 3
% 0.21/0.53 % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.21/0.53 % Forward subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 % Backward subsumed : 2
% 0.21/0.53 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.21/0.53 % User time : 0.148 s
% 0.21/0.53 % System time : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.53 % Total time : 0.168 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------