↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN405+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:07:36 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.17s 4.33s
% Output   : Proof 4.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SYN405+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:36:38 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.17/4.33  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.17/4.33  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (And (∀ (X : Iota), f X) (Exists fun Y => g Y) → Exists fun Z => And (f Z) (g Z))) True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (Not (And (∀ (X : Iota), f X) (Exists g) → Exists fun Z => And (f Z) (g Z))) True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (And (∀ (X : Iota), f X) (Exists g) → Exists fun Z => And (f Z) (g Z)) False
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (And (∀ (X : Iota), f X) (Exists g)) True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (Exists fun Z => And (f Z) (g Z)) False
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Exists g) True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #6 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), f X) True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (g (skS.0 0 a)) True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (f a) True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #9 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (f a) (g a)) False
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (f a) False) (Eq (g a) False)
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #11 (by forward demodulation #[10, 8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (g a) False)
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (g a) False
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #13 (by superposition #[12, 7]): Eq False True
% 4.17/4.33  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): False
% 4.17/4.33  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------