↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : SYN406+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:34:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 20.71s
% Output   : Proof 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  12   ~;   6   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn   6   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f0,conjecture,
    ( ( ? [Y] :
          ( h(Y)
          & f(Y) )
      & ! [X] :
          ( f(X)
         => g(X) ) )
   => ? [Z] :
        ( h(Z)
        & g(Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish240) ).

fof(f0_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ? [Y] :
            ( h(Y)
            & f(Y) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( f(X)
           => g(X) ) )
     => ? [Z] :
          ( h(Z)
          & g(Z) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f0]) ).

fof(f0_nnf,plain,
    ( ! [Z] :
        ( ~ h(Z)
        | ~ g(Z) )
    & ? [Y] :
        ( h(Y)
        & f(Y) )
    & ! [X] :
        ( g(X)
        | ~ f(X) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f0_neg]) ).

fof(f0_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Z] :
      ( ( ~ h(Z)
        | ~ g(Z) )
      & h(sk0)
      & f(sk0)
      & ( g(X)
        | ~ f(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk0])],[f0_nnf]) ).

cnf(c0,plain,
    ( g(X0)
    | ~ f(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi0,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(f(X0),true,g(X0),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c0]) ).

cnf(c1,plain,
    f(sk0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi1,negated_conjecture,
    f(sk0) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c1]) ).

cnf(h0,plain,
    g(sk0) = true,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi0,hi1]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ( ~ h(X2)
    | ~ g(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi3,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(g(X0),true,ifeq(h(X0),true,false,true),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c3]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    h(sk0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi2,negated_conjecture,
    h(sk0) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c2]) ).

cnf(t0,plain,
    true = false,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi3,h0,hi2]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    false = true,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t0]) ).

cnf(goal_0,negated_conjecture,
    true != false,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c3]) ).

cnf(g0_0,plain,
    true != true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[goal_0,t13]) ).

cnf(contradiction_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[g0_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SYN406+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.08/0.34   % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/20.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/20.23  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/20.23  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:05:27 UTC 2026
% 0.03/20.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/20.24  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/20.71  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/20.71  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------