%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN407+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:27 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.62s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SYN407+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 20:36:53 EDT 2024 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.57/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.57/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.57/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.57/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.57/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.57/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.57/0.61 % 0.57/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.57/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.57/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.62 % File : SYN407+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.57/0.62 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.57/0.62 % Problem : Kalish and Montague Problem 241 % 0.57/0.62 % Version : Especial. % 0.57/0.62 % English : Laws of alphabetic variance. % 0.57/0.62 % 0.57/0.62 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal % 0.57/0.62 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.57/0.62 % Source : [Hah94] % 0.57/0.62 % Names : kalish241 [Hah94] % 0.57/0.62 % 0.57/0.62 % Status : Theorem % 0.57/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 0.57/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.57/0.62 % Number of atoms : 7 ( 0 equ) % 0.57/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 7 avg) % 0.57/0.62 % Number of connectives : 6 ( 0 ~; 2 |; 1 &) % 0.57/0.62 % ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.57/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 5 avg) % 0.57/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.57/0.62 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty) % 0.57/0.62 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.57/0.62 % Number of variables : 3 ( 2 !; 1 ?) % 0.57/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ % 0.57/0.62 % 0.57/0.62 % Comments : % 0.57/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.62 fof(kalish241,conjecture, % 0.57/0.62 ( ! [X] : % 0.57/0.62 ( f(X) % 0.57/0.62 => ( g(X) % 0.57/0.62 | h(X) ) ) % 0.57/0.62 => ( ! [Y] : % 0.57/0.62 ( f(Y) % 0.57/0.62 => g(Y) ) % 0.57/0.62 | ? [Z] : % 0.57/0.62 ( f(Z) % 0.57/0.62 & h(Z) ) ) ) ). % 0.57/0.62 % 0.57/0.62 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.62 % Proof found % 0.57/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.57/0.62 % SZS output start Proof % 0.57/0.62 %ClaNum:4(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.57/0.62 %VarNum:5(SingletonVarNum:2) % 0.57/0.62 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.57/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.57/0.62 %SharedTerms:3 % 0.57/0.62 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 % 0.57/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.57/0.62 [1]P1(a1) % 0.57/0.62 [2]~P2(a1) % 0.57/0.62 [3]~P3(x31)+~P1(x31) % 0.57/0.62 [4]P3(x41)+~P1(x41)+P2(x41) % 0.57/0.62 %EqnAxiom % 0.57/0.62 % 0.57/0.62 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.62 cnf(7,plain, % 0.57/0.62 ($false), % 0.57/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4]), % 0.57/0.62 ['proof']). % 0.57/0.62 % SZS output end Proof % 0.57/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------