%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN408+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:28 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN408+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 22:07:53 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.20/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.20/0.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.20/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.20/0.60 % Transform :cnf % 0.20/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.20/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.20/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.20/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.20/0.60 % File : SYN408+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.20/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.20/0.60 % Problem : Kalish and Montague Problem 244 % 0.20/0.60 % Version : Especial. % 0.20/0.60 % English : Laws of alphabetic variance. % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 % Refs : [KM64] Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal % 0.20/0.60 % : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.20/0.60 % Source : [Hah94] % 0.20/0.60 % Names : kalish244 [Hah94] % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 % Status : Theorem % 0.20/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 0.20/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.20/0.60 % Number of atoms : 3 ( 0 equ) % 0.20/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 3 avg) % 0.20/0.60 % Number of connectives : 3 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &) % 0.20/0.60 % ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.20/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 4 avg) % 0.20/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.20/0.60 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty) % 0.20/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.20/0.60 % Number of variables : 2 ( 1 !; 1 ?) % 0.20/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 % Comments : % 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.20/0.60 fof(kalish244,conjecture, % 0.20/0.60 ( ~ ? [X] : f(X) % 0.20/0.60 => ! [Y] : % 0.20/0.60 ( f(Y) % 0.20/0.60 => g(Y) ) ) ). % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.20/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.20/0.60 % Proof found % 0.20/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.20/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.20/0.60 %ClaNum:3(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.20/0.60 %VarNum:1(SingletonVarNum:1) % 0.20/0.60 %MaxLitNum:1 % 0.20/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.20/0.60 %SharedTerms:3 % 0.20/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 3 % 0.20/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:3 % 0.20/0.60 [1]P1(a1) % 0.20/0.60 [2]~P2(a1) % 0.20/0.60 [3]~P1(x31) % 0.20/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.20/0.60 % 0.20/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.20/0.60 cnf(4,plain, % 0.20/0.61 ($false), % 0.20/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3]), % 0.20/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.20/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.20/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------