%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN408+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:10:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.32s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 12 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 6 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 1 sgn 3 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kalish244,conjecture,
( ~ ? [X1] : f(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( f(X2)
=> g(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish244) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ~ ? [X1] : f(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( f(X2)
=> g(X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[kalish244]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X3] :
( ~ f(X3)
& f(esk1_0)
& ~ g(esk1_0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
f(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ f(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.09 % Problem : SYN408+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:16:42 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.32 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.32 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.14/0.32 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.14/0.32 #
% 0.14/0.32 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.32
% 0.14/0.32 # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.32 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.32 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.32 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------