↑ Up

Drodi---4.1.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi---4.1.1
% Problem  : SYN411+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:16:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   2 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  20   ~;  16   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (  36   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z)
  <=> ~ ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z)
    <=> ~ ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z)
  <~> ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ( ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W)
      | ? [X,Y,Z] : ~ f(X,Y,Z) )
    & ( ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W)
      | ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z) ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ~ f(sK3_skl,sK4_skl,sK5_skl)
      | ~ f(sK0_skl,sK1_skl,sK2_skl) )
    & ( ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W)
      | ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0_skl,sK1_skl,sK2_skl,sK3_skl,sK4_skl,sK5_skl]),skolemize(X,sK0_skl),skolemize(Y,sK1_skl),skolemize(Z,sK2_skl),skolemize(U,sK3_skl),skolemize(V,sK4_skl),skolemize(W,sK5_skl)],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( f(X3,X4,X5)
      | f(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK3_skl,sK4_skl,sK5_skl)
    | ~ f(sK0_skl,sK1_skl,sK2_skl) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,definition,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( sQ0_spl
    <=> f(X0,X1,X2) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ0_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ sQ0_spl
      | f(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    sQ0_spl,
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f6,f8]) ).

fof(f12,definition,
    ( sQ1_spl
  <=> f(sK0_skl,sK1_skl,sK2_skl) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ1_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( sQ1_spl
    | ~ f(sK0_skl,sK1_skl,sK2_skl) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

fof(f15,definition,
    ( sQ2_spl
  <=> f(sK3_skl,sK4_skl,sK5_skl) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ2_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( sQ2_spl
    | ~ f(sK3_skl,sK4_skl,sK5_skl) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( ~ sQ2_spl
    | ~ sQ1_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f7,f12,f15]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( sQ1_spl
    | ~ sQ0_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14,f9]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( sQ1_spl
    | ~ sQ0_spl ),
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( sQ2_spl
    | ~ sQ0_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f17,f9]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( sQ2_spl
    | ~ sQ0_spl ),
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f11,f18,f20,f22]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN411+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:56:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.14/0.39  % Refutation found
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.14/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.42  % Elapsed time: 0.039736 seconds
% 0.14/0.42  % CPU time: 0.112262 seconds
% 0.14/0.42  % Total memory used: 16.466 MB
% 0.14/0.42  % Net memory used: 15.858 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------