↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN412+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem    : SYN412+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 18:45:09 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.60  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.58/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.58/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.58/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.58/0.63  
% 0.58/0.63  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.58/0.63  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.58/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.63  % File     : SYN412+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.58/0.63  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.58/0.63  % Problem  : Kalish and Montague Problem 255
% 0.58/0.63  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.58/0.63  % English  :
% 0.58/0.63  
% 0.58/0.63  % Refs     : [KM64]  Kalish & Montegue (1964), Logic: Techniques of Formal
% 0.58/0.63  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.58/0.63  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.58/0.63  % Names    : kalish255 [Hah94]
% 0.58/0.63  
% 0.58/0.63  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.58/0.63  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.58/0.63  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   0 equ)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Number of connectives :    3 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
% 0.58/0.63  %                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.58/0.63  %            Number of variables   :    2 (   1   !;   1   ?)
% 0.58/0.63  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.58/0.63  
% 0.58/0.63  % Comments :
% 0.60/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.63  fof(kalish255,conjecture,
% 0.60/0.63      ~ ? [X] :
% 0.60/0.63        ! [Y] :
% 0.60/0.63          ( f(X,Y)
% 0.60/0.63        <=> ~ f(X,X) ) ).
% 0.60/0.63  
% 0.60/0.63  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.60/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.63  %ClaNum:2(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.60/0.63  %VarNum:2(SingletonVarNum:2)
% 0.60/0.63  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.60/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.60/0.63  %SharedTerms:3
% 0.60/0.63  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.60/0.63  [1]P1(a1,x11)+P1(a1,a1)
% 0.60/0.63  [2]~P1(a1,x21)+~P1(a1,a1)
% 0.60/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.63  
% 0.60/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.61/0.64  cnf(3,plain,
% 0.61/0.64     (P1(a1,a1)),
% 0.61/0.64     inference(factoring_inference,[],[1])).
% 0.61/0.64  cnf(4,plain,
% 0.61/0.64     (~P1(a1,a1)),
% 0.61/0.64     inference(factoring_inference,[],[2])).
% 0.61/0.64  cnf(5,plain,
% 0.61/0.64     ($false),
% 0.61/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4]),
% 0.61/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.61/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.61/0.64  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------