%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:23:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.11s 0.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_15ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X4,X3)
| ~ h(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ f(X2)
| g(esk6_1(X1)) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X5)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X3)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| h(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X1,X3)
| ~ h(X1,X2)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ f(X2)
| h(X1,esk6_1(X1)) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
h(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_6]),c_0_5]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(esk3_0,X1)
| ~ f(X1)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| f(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X2,X1)
| ~ f(X1)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| g(esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X5)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X2,X3)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X3,X2)
| ~ f(X2)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| g(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X1,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(X1,X2)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_14]),c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| g(esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]),c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(X1)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| f(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(X1)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0)
| f(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| f(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:54:24 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 813598 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 813604 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % No proof found!
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses : 13
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.11/0.44 % Processed clauses : 37
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.11/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 28
% 0.11/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.11/0.44 % Generated clauses : 31
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.11/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 0.11/0.44 % Paramodulations : 27
% 0.11/0.44 % Factorizations : 4
% 0.11/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of those cached : 5
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.11/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 47
% 0.11/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 0.11/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1488
% 0.11/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 233
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------