%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:33:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.15s 10.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_3ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X5)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X2,X3)
| g(esk6_1(X4))
| g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X5)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X2,X3)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| g(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X5)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X3)
| h(X4,esk6_1(X4))
| h(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
h(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X1,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(X1,X2)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(esk3_0,X1)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| f(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(X5)
| ~ h(X4,X5)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ h(X1,X3)
| g(esk6_1(X4))
| h(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(esk4_0)
| g(X1)
| g(esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ h(X1,X3)
| ~ f(X3)
| ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(X1,X2)
| g(esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(esk3_0,esk6_1(esk3_0))
| g(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ f(esk4_0)
| h(esk3_0,X1)
| g(esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( h(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| g(esk6_1(esk3_0)) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(X1)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| h(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(X1)
| ~ h(esk1_0,X1)
| f(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ g(esk5_0)
| ~ h(esk3_0,esk5_0)
| f(esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( f(esk2_0)
| f(esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN414+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/10.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/10.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:53:16 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/10.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/10.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/10.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/10.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % sh5l with pid 602080 completed with status 1
% 0.15/10.44 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/10.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/10.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/10.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 602081 completed with status 1
% 0.15/10.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/10.44 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/10.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/10.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/10.44
% 0.15/10.44 % No proof found!
% 0.15/10.44 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.15/10.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/10.44 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.15/10.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Initial clauses : 13
% 0.15/10.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13
% 0.15/10.44 % Processed clauses : 43
% 0.15/10.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % ...subsumed : 9
% 0.15/10.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.15/10.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.15/10.44 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.15/10.44 % Generated clauses : 63
% 0.15/10.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 63
% 0.15/10.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.15/10.44 % Paramodulations : 57
% 0.15/10.44 % Factorizations : 6
% 0.15/10.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.15/10.44 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.15/10.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/10.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.15/10.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/10.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 15
% 0.15/10.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 51
% 0.15/10.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.15/10.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 25
% 0.15/10.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/10.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/10.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/10.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1936
% 0.15/10.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 233
% 0.15/10.44
% 0.15/10.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.44 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/10.44 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/10.44 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/10.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3576 pages
% 0.15/10.44
% 0.15/10.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/10.44 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/10.44 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/10.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/10.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------