↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.SAT-Mod.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN433-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:40:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 1.75s 1.26s
% Output   : Model 1.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%------ Positive definition of hskp25 
fof(lit_def,axiom,
    ( hskp25
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of ndr1_0 
fof(lit_def_001,axiom,
    ( ndr1_0
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp24 
fof(lit_def_002,axiom,
    ( hskp24
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp23 
fof(lit_def_003,axiom,
    ( hskp23
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp22 
fof(lit_def_004,axiom,
    ( hskp22
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp20 
fof(lit_def_005,axiom,
    ( hskp20
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp19 
fof(lit_def_006,axiom,
    ( hskp19
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp16 
fof(lit_def_007,axiom,
    ( hskp16
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp15 
fof(lit_def_008,axiom,
    ( hskp15
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp14 
fof(lit_def_009,axiom,
    ( hskp14
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp13 
fof(lit_def_010,axiom,
    ( hskp13
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp12 
fof(lit_def_011,axiom,
    ( hskp12
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp11 
fof(lit_def_012,axiom,
    ( hskp11
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp10 
fof(lit_def_013,axiom,
    ( hskp10
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp9 
fof(lit_def_014,axiom,
    ( hskp9
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp8 
fof(lit_def_015,axiom,
    ( hskp8
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp7 
fof(lit_def_016,axiom,
    ( hskp7
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp6 
fof(lit_def_017,axiom,
    ( hskp6
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp5 
fof(lit_def_018,axiom,
    ( hskp5
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp4 
fof(lit_def_019,axiom,
    ( hskp4
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp3 
fof(lit_def_020,axiom,
    ( hskp3
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp2 
fof(lit_def_021,axiom,
    ( hskp2
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp1 
fof(lit_def_022,axiom,
    ( hskp1
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of hskp0 
fof(lit_def_023,axiom,
    ( hskp0
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of c1_1 
fof(lit_def_024,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c1_1(X0)
    <=> ( X0 = a197
        | X0 = a202
        | X0 = a211
        | X0 = a200
        | X0 = a208
        | X0 = a216
        | X0 = a218 ) ) ).

%------ Positive definition of c2_1 
fof(lit_def_025,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c2_1(X0)
    <=> ( X0 = a202
        | X0 = a211
        | X0 = a200
        | X0 = a208
        | X0 = a216
        | X0 = a218 ) ) ).

%------ Positive definition of c0_1 
fof(lit_def_026,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c0_1(X0)
    <=> ( X0 = a198
        | X0 = a202
        | X0 = a205
        | X0 = a222
        | X0 = a199
        | X0 = a208
        | X0 = a216
        | X0 = a218 ) ) ).

%------ Positive definition of c3_1 
fof(lit_def_027,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c3_1(X0)
    <=> ( X0 = a198
        | X0 = a205
        | X0 = a222
        | X0 = a199
        | X0 = a200
        | X0 = a208
        | X0 = a216
        | X0 = a218 ) ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_10 
fof(lit_def_028,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_10
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_11 
fof(lit_def_029,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_11
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_12 
fof(lit_def_030,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_12
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_13 
fof(lit_def_031,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_13
  <=> $true ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_14 
fof(lit_def_032,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_14
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_15 
fof(lit_def_033,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_15
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_16 
fof(lit_def_034,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_16
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_17 
fof(lit_def_035,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_17
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_18 
fof(lit_def_036,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_18
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_19 
fof(lit_def_037,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_19
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_20 
fof(lit_def_038,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_20
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_21 
fof(lit_def_039,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_21
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_22 
fof(lit_def_040,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_22
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_23 
fof(lit_def_041,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_23
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_24 
fof(lit_def_042,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_24
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_25 
fof(lit_def_043,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_25
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_26 
fof(lit_def_044,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_26
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_27 
fof(lit_def_045,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_27
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_28 
fof(lit_def_046,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_28
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_29 
fof(lit_def_047,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_29
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_30 
fof(lit_def_048,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_30
  <=> $false ) ).

%------ Positive definition of iPr_def_31 
fof(lit_def_049,axiom,
    ( iPr_def_31
  <=> $false ) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SYN433-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.17/0.45  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.45  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:10:48 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.23/0.52  Running EPR theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s epr_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.23/0.55  % Proving...
% 1.75/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.75/1.26  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.75/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.75/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_non_horn_non_eq
% 1.75/1.26  % 
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_non_horn_non_eq
% 1.75/1.26   gs_s  sp: 33 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % 
% 1.75/1.26  % clauses                               117
% 1.75/1.26  % conjectures                           108
% 1.75/1.26  % EPR                                   117
% 1.75/1.26  % Horn                                  78
% 1.75/1.26  % unary                                 0
% 1.75/1.26  % binary                                69
% 1.75/1.26  % lits                                  304
% 1.75/1.26  % lits eq                               0
% 1.75/1.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.75/1.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.75/1.26  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.75/1.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.75/1.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ 
% 1.75/1.26  % Current options:
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ 
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % 
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 1.75/1.26  % 
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  % SZS status Satisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  ------ Building Model...Done
% 1.75/1.26  
% 1.75/1.26  %------ The model is defined over ground terms (initial term algebra).
% 1.75/1.26  %------ Predicates are defined as (\forall x_1,..,x_n  ((~)P(x_1,..,x_n) <=> (\phi(x_1,..,x_n)))) 
% 1.75/1.26  %------ where \phi is a formula over the term algebra.
% 1.75/1.26  %------ If we have equality in the problem then it is also defined as a predicate above, 
% 1.75/1.26  %------ with "=" on the right-hand-side of the definition interpreted over the term algebra term_algebra_type
% 1.75/1.26  %------ See help for --sat_out_model for different model outputs.
% 1.75/1.26  %------ equality_sorted(X0,X1,X2) can be used in the place of usual "="
% 1.75/1.26  %------ where the first argument stands for the sort ($i in the unsorted case)
% 1.75/1.26  % SZS output start Model for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.75/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------