%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYN491+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n130.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:47:36 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 24.49s % Output : FiniteModel 24.49s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN491+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.24 % Computer : n130.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.24 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.24 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.24 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.24 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.24 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.24 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 02:14:03 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime: % 24.49/12.73 Nitpicking formula... % 24.49/12.73 Timestamp: 02:14:15 % 24.49/12.73 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 24.49/12.73 able to skip some scopes % 24.49/12.73 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 24.49/12.73 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 24.49/12.73 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 24.49/12.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 24.49/12.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 24.49/12.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 24.49/12.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 24.49/12.73 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 24.49/12.73 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 24.49/12.73 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 24.49/12.73 % 24.49/12.73 Constants: % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a16 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a17 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a18 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a19 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a20 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a21 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a22 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a23 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_a24 = i1 % 24.49/12.73 bnd_c0_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 24.49/12.73 bnd_c1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 24.49/12.73 bnd_c2_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 24.49/12.73 bnd_c3_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp0 = False % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp1 = False % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp2 = False % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp3 = False % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp4 = False % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp5 = True % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp6 = False % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp7 = False % 24.49/12.73 bnd_hskp8 = True % 24.49/12.73 bnd_ndr1_0 = True % 24.49/12.73 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 24.49/12.73 Total time: 907 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------