%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYN495+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n034.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:47:37 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.94s % Output : FiniteModel 23.94s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN495+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n034.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 02:15:18 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime: % 23.94/12.96 Nitpicking formula... % 23.94/12.96 Timestamp: 02:15:26 % 23.94/12.96 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 23.94/12.96 able to skip some scopes % 23.94/12.96 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.94/12.96 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.94/12.96 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.94/12.96 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.94/12.96 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.94/12.96 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.94/12.96 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.94/12.96 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.94/12.96 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.94/12.96 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2: % 23.94/12.96 % 23.94/12.96 Constants: % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a61 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a62 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a63 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a64 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a65 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a66 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a67 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a68 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a69 = i2 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a70 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a71 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a72 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a73 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a74 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a75 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a76 = i1 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_a77 = i2 % 23.94/12.96 bnd_c0_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 23.94/12.96 bnd_c1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False) % 23.94/12.96 bnd_c2_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False) % 23.94/12.96 bnd_c3_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True) % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp0 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp1 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp10 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp11 = True % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp12 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp13 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp14 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp15 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp16 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp2 = True % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp3 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp4 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp5 = True % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp6 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp7 = True % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp8 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_hskp9 = False % 23.94/12.96 bnd_ndr1_0 = True % 23.94/12.96 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.94/12.96 Total time: 2.6 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------