%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYN517+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n049.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:47:44 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.41s % Output : FiniteModel 23.41s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN517+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n049.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 02:26:03 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime: % 23.41/12.40 Nitpicking formula... % 23.41/12.40 Timestamp: 02:26:11 % 23.41/12.40 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 23.41/12.40 able to skip some scopes % 23.41/12.40 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.41/12.40 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.41/12.40 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.41/12.40 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.41/12.40 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.41/12.40 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.41/12.40 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.41/12.40 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.41/12.40 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.41/12.40 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 23.41/12.40 % 23.41/12.40 Constants: % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a50 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a51 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a52 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a53 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a54 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a55 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a56 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a57 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a58 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a59 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a60 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a61 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a62 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a63 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a64 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a65 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a66 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a67 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a68 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_a69 = i1 % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c1_0 = True % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c1_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c2_0 = False % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c2_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c2_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c3_0 = True % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c3_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c3_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c4_0 = True % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c4_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c4_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c5_0 = False % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c5_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_c5_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 23.41/12.40 bnd_ndr1_0 = True % 23.41/12.40 bnd_ndr1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 23.41/12.40 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.41/12.40 Total time: 3.2 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------