%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYN524+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n127.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:47:46 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.97s % Output : FiniteModel 23.97s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN524+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n127.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 02:30:18 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime: % 23.97/10.32 Nitpicking formula... % 23.97/10.32 Timestamp: 02:30:26 % 23.97/10.32 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 23.97/10.32 able to skip some scopes % 23.97/10.32 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.97/10.32 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.97/10.32 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.97/10.32 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.97/10.32 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.97/10.32 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.97/10.32 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.97/10.32 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.97/10.32 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.97/10.32 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 23.97/10.32 % 23.97/10.32 Constants: % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a157 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a158 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a159 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a160 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a161 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a162 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a163 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a164 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a165 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a166 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a167 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a168 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a169 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a170 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a171 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a172 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a173 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a174 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a175 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a176 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a177 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a178 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a179 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a180 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a181 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a182 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a183 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a184 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a185 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a186 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_a187 = i1 % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c1_0 = True % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c1_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c2_0 = True % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c2_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c2_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c3_0 = False % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c3_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c3_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c4_0 = False % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c4_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c4_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c5_0 = False % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c5_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_c5_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 23.97/10.32 bnd_ndr1_0 = True % 23.97/10.32 bnd_ndr1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 23.97/10.32 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.97/10.32 Total time: 1.7 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------