%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYN527+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n039.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:47:48 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 25.24s % Output : FiniteModel 25.24s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN527+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % 0.02/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n039.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 02:31:48 CST 2017 % 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime: % 25.24/11.78 Nitpicking formula... % 25.24/11.78 Timestamp: 02:31:59 % 25.24/11.78 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 25.24/11.78 able to skip some scopes % 25.24/11.78 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 25.24/11.78 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 25.24/11.78 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 25.24/11.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 25.24/11.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 25.24/11.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 25.24/11.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 25.24/11.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 25.24/11.78 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 25.24/11.78 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 25.24/11.78 % 25.24/11.78 Constants: % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a251 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a252 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a253 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a254 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a255 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a256 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a257 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a258 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a259 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a260 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a261 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a262 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a263 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a264 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a265 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a266 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a267 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a268 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a269 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a270 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a271 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a272 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a273 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a274 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a275 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_a276 = i1 % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c1_0 = False % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c1_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c2_0 = False % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c2_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c2_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c3_0 = True % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c3_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c3_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c4_0 = True % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c4_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c4_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c5_0 = False % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c5_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_c5_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 25.24/11.78 bnd_ndr1_0 = True % 25.24/11.78 bnd_ndr1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 25.24/11.78 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 25.24/11.78 Total time: 1.0 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------