%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : SYN536+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n036.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:47:51 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 26.11s % Output : FiniteModel 26.11s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN536+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0. % 0.00/0.05 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.25 % Computer : n036.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.25 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.25 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.25 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 02:38:03 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.25 % CPUTime: % 26.11/10.63 Nitpicking formula... % 26.11/10.63 Timestamp: 02:38:12 % 26.11/10.63 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be % 26.11/10.63 able to skip some scopes % 26.11/10.63 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 26.11/10.63 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 26.11/10.63 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 26.11/10.63 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 26.11/10.63 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 26.11/10.63 % 26.11/10.63 Constants: % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a520 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a521 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a522 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a523 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a524 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a525 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a526 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a527 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a528 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a529 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a530 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a531 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a532 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a533 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a534 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a535 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a536 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a537 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a538 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a539 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a540 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a541 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a542 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a543 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a544 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_a545 = i1 % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c1_0 = True % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c1_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c2_0 = False % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c2_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c2_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c3_0 = False % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c3_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c3_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c4_0 = False % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c4_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c4_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c5_0 = False % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c5_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_c5_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 26.11/10.63 bnd_ndr1_0 = True % 26.11/10.63 bnd_ndr1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 26.11/10.63 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 26.11/10.63 Total time: 1.5 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------